Dunn v. Hart et al

Filing 136

ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 130 Report and Recommendations. The Court CONCURS with and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. Dunn's 128 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 8/16/2016. (csr)

Download PDF
N Me autteb state.0 flitritt court for the boutbem aitvttt of 4eorgta 39aptr000 38tNoton CLEVELAND D. DUNN, Plaintiff, V . DARRELL HART, Warden, Ware State Prison, et al., Defendants. * * * * * * * * * * CIVIL ACTION NO.: 5:13-cv-131 ORDER Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Cleveland Dunn's ("Dunn") Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated June 29, 2016. Dkt. No. 132. In his Objections, Dunn reiterates his argument that he should be permitted to amend his Complaint and describes his proposed claims. Dunn's Objection is not responsive to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.' Accordingly, Dunn's Objections are OVERRULED. The Court CONCURS with and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and 1 Furthermore, Dunn's contention that the Magistrate Judge failed to address Objection No. 4 in Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration is without merit. (Doe. 132, p. 5.) In his Objection No. 4, Dunn stated that "Plaintiff concurs with the Court completely on this point." (Doe. 128, p. 8.) Accordingly, there was no objection for the Magistrate Judge to address. AO 72A (Rev. 8/82) Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. Dunn's Motion for Reconsideration, doc. 128, is DENIED. SO ORDERED, , 2016. this LSA GODBJEY W,CF JUDGE UNITED SATES DISTRICT COURT SkJUTHER4 DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AO 72\ R. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?