Cleland et al v. Dollar General

Filing 63

ORDER denying 60 Bill of Costs. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 06/08/2016. (thb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA WAYCROSS REBA GAIL CLELAND, and TERRY W. DIVISION * CLELAND, * * Plaintiffs * v. * DOLGENCORP, LLC, d/b/a, 5:14-cv-76 * DOLLAR * GENERAL Defendant. ORDER On April 18, $2,332.55. 2016, maintains that judgment was entered on March 31, 2016 on four of Plaintiffs' five counts. of the (Doc. (Id.) 60 Defendant filed a bill of costs requesting at 1.) Accordingly, total costs to The Rule of reflect Civil the otherwise, a federal the prevailing party." than which 54 these governs when Rule 54(d)(1) rules, attorney's or a a fees—should party's provides that court To be a prevailing party, not prevail on all issues. Defendant (Id. at 3.) Procedure statute, costs—other costs percentage costs may be taxed to another party. "[u]nless of Defendant "calculated only four-fifths prevailed at summary judgment." Federal bill be provides allowed to "a party need A party who has obtained some relief usually will be regarded as the prevailing party even though he has not sustained all of his claims." Emery v. Am. 15-10100, 2016 WL 1425939, at *4 (11th Airlines, Cir. Apr. Inc., 12, No. 2016) (quotations and citations omitted) . In Emery, the Eleventh Circuit found that a plaintiff who prevailed on one of her four claims was the prevailing party in the case. Id. At this time, the Court has not entered final judgment in this case, Civ. and the P. that 54(b) Defendant is not a prevailing party. ("any order or other adjudicates fewer than all decision, claims to Fed. R. however designated, or liabilities of fewer than all the parties does as See the rights and not end the action any of the claims or parties and may be revised at any time before the entry of a judgment adjudicating all the claims and all the parties' rights Defendant's motion Gail Cleland's prove entered, liabilities"). The Court summary judgment with respect to FLSA claim for time worked during her (Doc. 58 at 17.) may for and to be prevailing party. Until and Plaintiff final the Court will not award costs in this case. Plaintiff lunch break. That claim will proceed to trial, the denied judgment is Defendant's request for costs (Doc. 60) is therefore DENIED. ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia, this jr^day of June, 2016. HONORABLE J. R^ UNITED 55TATES DISTRICT JUDGE (N DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?