Cleland et al v. Dollar General
Filing
63
ORDER denying 60 Bill of Costs. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 06/08/2016. (thb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
WAYCROSS
REBA GAIL CLELAND,
and TERRY W.
DIVISION
*
CLELAND,
*
*
Plaintiffs
*
v.
*
DOLGENCORP,
LLC,
d/b/a,
5:14-cv-76
*
DOLLAR
*
GENERAL
Defendant.
ORDER
On April 18,
$2,332.55.
2016,
maintains
that
judgment was entered on March 31, 2016 on four of Plaintiffs'
five
counts.
of
the
(Doc.
(Id.)
60
Defendant filed a bill of costs requesting
at
1.)
Accordingly,
total
costs
to
The
Rule
of
reflect
Civil
the
otherwise,
a
federal
the prevailing party."
than
which
54
these
governs
when
Rule 54(d)(1)
rules,
attorney's
or
a
a
fees—should
party's
provides that
court
To be a prevailing party,
not prevail on all issues.
Defendant
(Id. at 3.)
Procedure
statute,
costs—other
costs
percentage
costs may be taxed to another party.
"[u]nless
of
Defendant "calculated only four-fifths
prevailed at summary judgment."
Federal
bill
be
provides
allowed
to
"a party need
A party who has obtained some relief
usually will be regarded as the prevailing party even though he has
not sustained all of his claims." Emery v. Am.
15-10100,
2016
WL
1425939,
at
*4
(11th
Airlines,
Cir.
Apr.
Inc.,
12,
No.
2016)
(quotations and citations omitted) .
In Emery, the Eleventh Circuit
found that a plaintiff who prevailed on one of her four claims was
the prevailing party in the case.
Id.
At this time, the Court has not entered final judgment in this
case,
Civ.
and the
P.
that
54(b)
Defendant
is not
a prevailing party.
("any order or other
adjudicates
fewer
than
all
decision,
claims
to
Fed.
R.
however designated,
or
liabilities of fewer than all the parties does
as
See
the
rights
and
not end the action
any of the claims or parties and may be revised at
any time
before the entry of a judgment adjudicating all the claims and all
the
parties'
rights
Defendant's motion
Gail
Cleland's
prove
entered,
liabilities").
The
Court
summary judgment with respect
to
FLSA claim for time worked during her
(Doc. 58 at 17.)
may
for
and
to be
prevailing party.
Until
and Plaintiff
final
the Court will not award costs in this case.
Plaintiff
lunch break.
That claim will proceed to trial,
the
denied
judgment
is
Defendant's
request for costs (Doc. 60) is therefore DENIED.
ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia, this
jr^day of June,
2016.
HONORABLE J.
R^
UNITED 55TATES DISTRICT
JUDGE
(N DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?