Twiss v. King
Filing
13
ORDER granting 10 Motion for Default Judgment Against Joshua Lee King. Joshua Lee King is liable to the Plaintiff in the amount of $300,000 in compensatory damages and $2,200,000 in punitive damages. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Joshua Lee King for $2,500,000. Interest shall accrue at the rate required by law. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 2/18/2015. (csr) Modified on 2/18/2015 (csr).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
WAYCROSS DIVISION
GEORGE TWISS, as natural father,
legal guardian, and next friend of
S.T., a minor,
Plaintiff,
*
*
*
*
*
* Case Number: 5:14-cv-00077
V.
*
JOSHUA LEE KING,
*
*
Defendant.
*
DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST JOSHUA LEE KING
After the Clerk entered the default of the Defendant, the Court conducted a hearing
on January12, 2015 to determine default damages. This purpose of this Order is to set forth
the damages award Joshua Lee King owes to the Plaintiff.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The Plaintiff filed this lawsuit on October 6, 2014. (Doc. 1). The Complaint asserts
state law causes of action arising out of the Defendant's sexual abuse of a minor child.
The Defendant was served with the Complaint and Summons while in prison; (Doc.
7) however, the Defendant failed to serve or file an Answer or otherwise respond to the
Complaint. (See Docket). Following the Plaintiff's request, the Clerk entered the Default
of the Defendant. (Doc. 9). The Plaintiff then requested a hearing on the issue of damages,
(Doc. 10), and the Court set the damages hearing for January 12, 2015. (Doc. 11). On
December 22, 2014, the Clerk sent notice of the damages hearing to the Defendant at the
1
address of the prison where he is housed and where he was served. (Doc. 11). No one
appeared on behalf of the Defendant.
II. LEGAL STANDARD
"A defendant in default is deemed to admit the plaintiff's well-pleaded allegations
of fact, but is not held to admit facts that are not well-pleaded or to admit conclusions of
law." Holmes v. Margaret's Key. LLC, et, al., No. CV. 2:11-cv-00111-LGW-RSB (S.D. Ga.
October 14,2014)(citing S.E.C. v. Wright, 261 F. App'x 259,261-62 (llthCir. 2008) (quoting
Nishimatsu Constr. Co. v. Houston Nat'l Bank, 515 F.2d 1200,1206 (5th Cir. 1975)(internal
punctuation omitted). "Before entering a default judgment for damages, the court must
ensure that the well-pleaded allegations in the complaint, which are taken as true due to
the default, actually state a substantive cause of action and that there is a substantive,
sufficient basis in the pleadings for the particular relief sought." Id. (citing Cotton v. Mass.
Mut. Life Ins. Co., 402 F.3d 1267,1278 (11th Cir. 2005)). "However, since the entry of default
does not constitute an admission of conclusions of law, the court is still charged with
determining whether the unchallenged facts actually constitute a legitimate cause of
action." Id. "In considering any default judgment, the court must examine (1) jurisdiction,
(2) liability, and (3) damages." Margaret's Key, LLC, et, al., No. CV.
2:11-cv-00111-LGW-RSB (citing Pitts v. Seneca Sports, Inc., 321 F. Supp. 2d1353,1356 (S.D.
Ga. 2004)). With these considerations in mind, the Court evaluates jurisdiction, liability,
and damages.
2
This Court has personal jurisdiction over the Defendant because he was served with
the Summons and Complaint. (Doc. 7). The Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28
U.S.C. § 1332 because the Plaintiff and his daughter are residents of Florida and the
Defendant is a resident of Georgia and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.00,
excluding interest and costs. (Doc. 1).
Liability is properly established as well. On November 27, 2012, Plaintiff's daughter,
S.T., was eight-years old, and Defendant was 29 years old. (Complaint, ¶ 7). On that date,
the Defendant committed the following acts upon S.T.: licking her vagina; forcing her
hands on his penis; and causing his ejaculate to land on S.T. Id. at ¶j 8-10. The Brantley
County Grand Jury returned two true bills against the Defendant for his sexual abuse of
S.T. (Complaint, 111). The Defendant was indicted for committing aggravated sodomy
(O.C.G.A. § 16-6-2) and Child Molestation (O.C.G.A. § 16-6-4) on S.T. Id. On April 9, 2014,
Defendant pled guilty to the Child Molestation charge and the Aggravated Sodomy charge
was nolle-prossed. (Complaint, ¶ 12). Judge Jeffrey Kight, Superior Court of Brantley
County, accepted the Defendant's plea and sentenced the Defendant to 20 years in prison
for this crime. Id. at 11 13-14. Based upon the evidence presented at the damages hearing,
there is a basis for relief with regard to all of the counts set forth in the Complaint.'
'At the damages hearing, the Plaintiff stated that it was waiving the attorney's
fees claim. Thus, that claim is dismissed.
91
III. DAMAGES
At the damages hearing, the Plaintiff testified how S.T. has been affected as a result
of the conduct at issue in this case, including testimony that S.T. has nightmares, has eating
issues, attempts to have inappropriate contact with males, attempts to dress in
inappropriate clothing for her age, and has academic problems at school. The Plaintiff
testified that S.T. attends counseling as a result of the conduct at issue in this case. Based
upon the evidence presented at the damages hearing, the Court finds that the Defendant
acted "with the specific intent to cause harm" such that there is "no limitation regarding
the amount which may be awarded as punitive damages..." O.C.G.A. § 51-12-51(f).
After considering all the evidence before the Court, it is hereby ORDERED AND
ADJUDGED that Joshua Lee King is liable to the Plaintiff in the amount of:
$300,000 in compensatory damages to go towards past and future psychiatric
treatment, tutoring and other out of pocket expenses
and
$2,200,000 in punitive damages.
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against
Joshua Lee King for $2,500,000. Interest shall accrue at the rate required by law.
SO ORDERED, this ___ day of
I3BEY WOOD, CHIEF JUDGE
STATES DISTRICT COURT
RN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?