Disanto et al v. Thomas
Filing
35
ORDER ADOPTING 32 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court, and Defendant's Objections are OVERRULED. Defendant's 27 , 22 and 20 Motions to Strike, 26 , 24 , and 17 Motions to Amend/Correct , 13 Motion for Default Judgment, 30 Motion for Immediate Consideration are DISMISSED as moot. The Court GRANTS Karen Lawson's and Margaret Cartwright's 12 Motion to Remand, and REMANDS this case to the Lake County, Ohio, Court of Common Pleas. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 2/19/2016. (ca)
3n the mutteb btatto flittitt Court
for the boutbern flitritt of georata
aptro Dibttou
DORENE DISANTO; KAREN LAWSON;
MARGARET CARTWRIGHT; STATE OF
OHIO; and MIKE DEWIINE,
Plaintiffs,
V.
THOMAS L. THOMAS,
Defendant.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 5:15-cv-36
ORDER
After an independent and de novo review of the entire
record, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's February2,
2016, Report and Recommendation, dkt. no. 32, to which Defendant
filed Objections, dkt. no. 33. Defendant's Objections are
little more than a verbatim recitation of the assertions he has
already presented to this Court. Accordingly, the Magistrate
Judge's Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED as the
opinion of the Court, and Defendant's Objections are OVERRULED.
The Court GRANTS Karen Lawson's and Margaret Cartwright's Motion
for Remand and REMANDS this case to the Lake County, Ohio, Court
of Common Pleas. Defendant's Motions for Default Judgment,
Motions to Amend/Correct, Motions to Strike, and Motion for
AO 72A
(Rev. 8/82)
Immediate Consideration are DISMISSED as moot. The Clerk of
Court is DIRECTED to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal
and to CLOSE this case.
SO ORDERED, this 19TH day of February, 2016.
LISA GODBEY 400D, CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
AO 72A
(Rev. 8/82)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?