Tabb v. Bryson et al

Filing 42

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis re: 36 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 2/29/2016. (csr)

Download PDF
3k' the Uniteb Stateo Jitritt Court for the boutbern 30iotrttt of georgia aptro ibtion JOSEPH TABB, Plaintiff, V. HOMER BRYSON, et al., Defendants. * * * * * * * * * CIVIL ACTION NO.: 5:15-cv-58 ORDER Plaintiff has filed an interlocutory appeal of the portion of this Court's February 3, 2016, Order denying Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. Dkt. No. 34. Though Plaintiff has not moved to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, any such attempt on Plaintiff's part is DENIED. An appeal cannot be taken in forma pauperis if the trial Court certifies, either before or after the notice of appeal is filed, that the appeal is not taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (a) (3); Fed. R. App. P. 24(a) (3). Good faith in this context must be judged by an objective standard. Busch v. cty. of Volusia, 189 F.R.D. 687, 691 (M.D. Fla. 1999). A party does not proceed in good faith when it seeks to advance a frivolous claim or argument. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962); Whitted v. Roberts, Case No. 06-CV-776-KDB, 2010 WL AO 72A (Rev. 8/82) 2025391, at *1 (S.D. Ala. Apr. 27, 2010) . A claim or argument is frivolous when it appears the factual allegations are clearly baseless or the legal theories are indisputably meritless. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327 (1989); Carroll v. Gross, 984 F.2d 392, 393 (11th Cir. 1993) . Or, stated another way, an in forma pauperis action is frivolous, and thus not brought in good faith, if it is 'without arguable merit either in law or fact." Napier v. Preslicka, 314 F.3d 528, 531 (11th Cir. 2002) Bilal v. Driver, 251 F.3d 1346, 1349 (11th Cir. 2001) "Arguable means capable of being convincingly argued." Sun v. Forrester, 939 F.2d 924, 925 (11th Cir. 1991) (internal quotations and citations omitted) For the reasons set forth in this Court's Order denying Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, the claims and arguments Plaintiff seeks to raise on appeal are without arguable merit either in law or fact. Consequently, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis because the appeal is not taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). SO ORDERED, this - 7A dayA LISA GGpBE)' WOOD, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED A'TES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AG 72A (Rev. 818 2) 2 , 2016.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?