Alexander v. Hall et al
Filing
22
ORDER ADOPTING 20 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court, and OVERRULES Alexander's Objections. The Court DISMISSES, without prejudice, Alexander's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Court DENIES Alexander leave to proceed in forma pauperis and a certificate of appealability. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 5/25/2017. (ca)
tl^e tlSmteli States! Bifiitnct Court
:lfor t|ie ^ont^iem IBtOtnct ot(deorgta
^apcrooo IBtiitOtott
FILED
Scott L. Poff, Clerk
United States District Court
By casbell at 8:29 am, May 26, 2017
JOHN T. ALEXANDER,
Petitioner,
CV 515-72
V.
WARDEN HILTON HALL; and SAMUEL
S. OLENS,
Respondents.
ORDER
After an independent and de novo review of the record, the
undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's March 6, 2017,
Report and Recommendation, dkt. no. 20, to which Petitioner John
T. Alexander
review
of
entitled
('"Alexander") filed
Alexander's
to
equitable
Objections
tolling
of
Objections, dkt.
fails to
the
no.
reveal that
statute
of
21.
A
he
is
limitations
applicable to his Section 2254 Petition.
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation
of
the
Magistrate
Judge
as
the
OVERRULES Alexander's Objections.
opinion
of
the
Court,
and
The Court DISMISSES, without
prejudice, Alexander's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254.
A0 72A
(Rev. 8/82)
The Court also DENIES Alexander leave to appeal in forma
pauperis and a certificate of appealability.
the
Clerk
of
Court
to
enter
the
The Court DIRECTS
appropriate
judgment
dismissal and to CLOSE this case.
SO ORDERED, this
y 2 day of
, 2017.
HON. LISA GODBEY WOOD, JUDGE
UNITED-ESTATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN
A0 72A
(Rev. 8/82)
DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
of
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?