Alexander v. Hall et al

Filing 22

ORDER ADOPTING 20 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court, and OVERRULES Alexander's Objections. The Court DISMISSES, without prejudice, Alexander's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Court DENIES Alexander leave to proceed in forma pauperis and a certificate of appealability. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 5/25/2017. (ca)

Download PDF
tl^e tlSmteli States! Bifiitnct Court :lfor t|ie ^ont^iem IBtOtnct ot(deorgta ^apcrooo IBtiitOtott FILED Scott L. Poff, Clerk United States District Court By casbell at 8:29 am, May 26, 2017 JOHN T. ALEXANDER, Petitioner, CV 515-72 V. WARDEN HILTON HALL; and SAMUEL S. OLENS, Respondents. ORDER After an independent and de novo review of the record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's March 6, 2017, Report and Recommendation, dkt. no. 20, to which Petitioner John T. Alexander review of entitled ('"Alexander") filed Alexander's to equitable Objections tolling of Objections, dkt. fails to the no. reveal that statute of 21. A he is limitations applicable to his Section 2254 Petition. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the OVERRULES Alexander's Objections. opinion of the Court, and The Court DISMISSES, without prejudice, Alexander's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254. A0 72A (Rev. 8/82) The Court also DENIES Alexander leave to appeal in forma pauperis and a certificate of appealability. the Clerk of Court to enter the The Court DIRECTS appropriate judgment dismissal and to CLOSE this case. SO ORDERED, this y 2 day of , 2017. HON. LISA GODBEY WOOD, JUDGE UNITED-ESTATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN A0 72A (Rev. 8/82) DISTRICT OF GEORGIA of

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?