Williams v. Warden, F.S.L. Jesup

Filing 12

ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 8 Report and Recommendation, and OVERRULES Williams' Objections. In addition, the Court DENIES Williams' 11 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and Williams' 9 Motion to Am end. Consequently, the Court DISMISSES Williams' Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Additionally, the Court DENIES Williams leave to appeal in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 6/17/2016. (csr)

Download PDF
n the Uniteb btatto flitritt Court for the boutbern aitritt of georgia 39aptr000 fltbtton FRANKLIN L. WILLIAMS, Petitioner, V. WARDEN, F.S.L. JESUP, Respondent. * * * * * * * * * CIVIL ACTION NO.: 5:16-ev-1 ORDER Presently before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's May 16, 2016, Report and Recommendation, dkt. no. 8, to which Petitioner Franklin Williams ("Williams") has filed a Motion to Amend for Relief, dkt. no. 11, and Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, dkt. no. 10. Williams also filed a second Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Dkt. No. 11. After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the Court CONCURS with the Magistrate Judge, ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court, and OVERRULES Williams' Objections. In addition, the Court DENIES Williams' Motion to Amend and Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. AO 72A (Rev. 8/82) Consequently, the Court DISMISSES Williams' Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241. Additionally, the Court DENIES Williams leave to appeal in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. SO ORDERED, this J'ldaY of , 2016. LISA GODY WOOD, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STA&DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AO 72A (Rev. 8/82) 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?