Jordan v. City of Waycross, Georgia et al

Filing 61

ORDER re 56 Notice of Settlement, 57 USCA Mandate. (Parties Dismissal Judgment due by 7/15/2020.) Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 5/18/2020. (ca)

Download PDF
Case 5:17-cv-00033-LGW-BWC Document 61 Filed 05/18/20 Page 1 of 2 In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia Waycross Division FILED John E. Triplett, Acting Clerk United States District Court By CAsbell at 12:09 pm, May 18, 2020 WILLIAM N. JORDAN, Plaintiff, v. No. 5:17-cv-33 CITY OF WAYCROSS, GEORGIA; DAVID E. EDDINS, fire chief for the city of Waycross, Georgia, in his individual and official capacities; TRINIJA MOLINAMARTIN, individually and in her official capacity as director of human resources and risk management of the city of Waycross, Georgia; and RAPHEL MADDOX, individually and in his official capacity as city manager of the city of Waycross, Georgia, Defendants. ORDER On August 27, 2018, the Court granted and denied in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. appealed to the Eleventh Circuit. Dkt. No. 44. Dkt. No. 48. Defendants While the appeal was pending, the parties reached a settlement agreement, dkt. no. 56, and dismissed the appeal, dkt. no. 57. Accordingly, on or before July 15, 2020, the parties may present a dismissal judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Case 5:17-cv-00033-LGW-BWC Document 61 Filed 05/18/20 Page 2 of 2 Procedure 41(a)(2), incorporating the terms of the parties’ settlement, so the Court may retain jurisdiction to enforce the agreement. If the parties elect not to file a dismissal judgment as described above, the Court will dismiss the case with prejudice. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 38182 (1994). SO ORDERED, this 18th day of May, 2020. _________ ____ HON. LISA GODBEY WOOD, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?