Berry v. Bryson et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 . 7 Motion, 5 Motion for Writ of Mandamus, and 6 Motion are dismissed as moot. Clerk is directed to enter judgment of dismissal. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 6/13/17. (slt)
?[Entteti States! IBisitrtct Conrt
^outliem Btsitrtct of (f^eorgta
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 5:17-cv-35
BRYSON;EDWINA JOHNSON; AMMOS
TAYLOR; WILLIAM DANFORTH;TOM
GRAMIAK;TIMOTHY ALLEN WARD;
and BRIAN OWENS,
After an independent and de novo review of the entire
record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's
May 5, 2017, Report and Recommendation, dkt. no. 4, to which
Plaintiff failed to file Objections.^
Accordingly, the Court
ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the
opinion of the Court.
Instead, Plaintiff filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus, dkt.
no. 5, and Motion to Correct Void Sentence, dkt. no. 6. However, even
under the most liberal reading, Plaintiff's filings cannot be
construed as Objections. Plaintiff makes no mention of the Magistrate
Judge's Report and Recommendation, nor does it appear that any of
these filings can be construed as a Motion for Leave to Proceed in
Forma Pa uperis.
The Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff's
Coinplaint, DENIES Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis,
DISMISSES all pending motions as MOOT, and DIRECTS the Clerk of
Court to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to
CLOSE this case.
SO ORDERED, this
HON. LISA >GODBB¥-WOOD, JUDGE
UNETED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SoilTHERl/DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?