Williams v. United States of America

Filing 81

ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 61 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant's Motion is GRANTED with respect to Count I. Defendant's Motion is DENIED with respect to Count II. Defendant's Daubert challe nge is DENIED, but Defendant may reurge it before trial. Defendant is GRANTED the opportunity to depose Dr. Hansen on the limited topic of Dr. Hansen's opinions set forth in his affidavit. Plaintiff's 78 Motion to Strike Defendant's Motion to Exclude Dr. Hansen's Affidavit Opinion As Time Barred by Court's Sixth Amended Scheduling Order is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 8/13/2019. (csr)

Download PDF
Jin ?l9ntteii States!IBts(tnct Cotttt for tl^e ^ontl^erti Biotrict of <l^eorgta ^apcrooo Idibtoton ESTHER WILLIAMS, Individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of PHILLIP WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, CV 5:17-088 V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ORDER Before the Court are Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, dkt. no. 61, and Plaintiff's Motion to Strike, dkt. no. 78. Motions have been fully briefed and are ripe for review. The For the reasons provided below. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike is DENIED as moot. BACKGROUND This action arises from the death of Phillip Williams (the ''Decedent") on July 3, 2014. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant committed due medical malpractice to many negligent omissions that allegedly caused Decedent's death. A0 72A (Rev. 8/82) acts or

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?