Miller v. King, et al
Filing
537
ORDER directing the Clerk to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this action; within sixty days of the date this order is entered, the parties may present a dismissal judgment. If the parties fail to file a dismissal judgment as described above, the Court will dismiss the case with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Graham on 9/14/2010. (csr)
Miller v. King, et al
Doc. 537
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION
FILED flSTPCT CO1 ' DY FU 4 Z8I0SEPI4 Ppj(4:
TRACY ANTHONY MILLER, Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION NO CV698109
CLERPL. SODIST. IF A.
V.
HUGH SMITH, et. al., Defendants.
ORDER
The Court has been advised by counsel for the parties that the above-captioned case has been settled. Accordingly, the Court directs the Clerk to ADMINISTRATIVELY
CLOSE this action. See Heape v. Flanagan, CV607-12, 2008 WL
2439736 (S.D. Ga. June 9, 2008) Within sixty days of the date this order is entered, the parties may present a dismissal judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) (2), incorporating the terms of the parties' settlement, so the Court may retain jurisdiction to enforce the agreement. If the parties fail to file a dismissal judgment as described above, the Court will dismiss the case with prejudice. Kokkonen v. Guardian Lire Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994) .
SO ORDERED, this
/4"
day of
September
2010
E. GRAHAM STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?