Miller v. King, et al

Filing 537

ORDER directing the Clerk to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this action; within sixty days of the date this order is entered, the parties may present a dismissal judgment. If the parties fail to file a dismissal judgment as described above, the Court will dismiss the case with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Graham on 9/14/2010. (csr)

Miller v. King, et al

Doc. 537

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION

FILED flSTPCT CO1 ' DY FU 4 Z8I0SEPI4 Ppj(4:

TRACY ANTHONY MILLER, Plaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION NO CV698109

CLERPL. SODIST. IF A.

V.
HUGH SMITH, et. al., Defendants.

ORDER

The Court has been advised by counsel for the parties that the above-captioned case has been settled. Accordingly, the Court directs the Clerk to ADMINISTRATIVELY
CLOSE this action. See Heape v. Flanagan, CV607-12, 2008 WL

2439736 (S.D. Ga. June 9, 2008) Within sixty days of the date this order is entered, the parties may present a dismissal judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) (2), incorporating the terms of the parties' settlement, so the Court may retain jurisdiction to enforce the agreement. If the parties fail to file a dismissal judgment as described above, the Court will dismiss the case with prejudice. Kokkonen v. Guardian Lire Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994) .
SO ORDERED, this

/4"

day of

September

2010

E. GRAHAM STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com