Lamb v. Upton et al

Filing 36

ORDER adopting 13 Report and Recommendations and dismissing defendants Wagner, Upton, Miller, Reardon, Sittnick, Fields, and Donald. Plaintiff's false accusation claim against Defendant Dasher is DISMISSED. Likewise, Plaintiff's monetary damage claims against Defendants Kennedy and Dasher in their official capacities are DISMISSED.. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 10/13/2009. (Herb, Logan)

Download PDF
20090CT 13 AN U:O IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION THEOWANDA LAMB, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV608-093 STEVE UPTON; DANE DASHER; JOHNNY KENNEDY; LARRY WAGNER; JAMES DONALD; TOM SITTNICK; SHEVANDAH FIELDS; R, REARDON; and JOHNNY SMITH, Defendants. ORDER After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which Objections have been filed. Plaintiffs Objections are nothing more than a recitation of the facts he set forth in his original Complaint, paired with arguments by which Plaintiff unsuccessfully attempts to make a causal connection between Defendants' alleged actions and constitutional violations. AO 72A (Rev. 8/82) Plaintiff's Objections are without merit. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted as the opinion of the Court. Defendants Wagner, Upton, Miller, Reardon, Sittnick, Fields, and Donald are DISMISSED from this cause of action. Plaintiff's false accusation claim against Defendant Dasher is DISMISSED. Likewise, Plaintiff's monetary damages claims against Defendants Kennedy and Dasher in their official capacities are DISMISSED. SO ORDERED, this /3 day ofoi^2 4-- , 2009. B. AVJQNT EDENFI JD, JUDGE UNITED STATES [ ISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DIST4 ICT OF GEORGIA AO 72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?