Brown et al v. Alvardo
Filing
31
ORDER stating that the parties have reached a settlement and requested that this case be dismissed. Plaintiffs' claims are dismissed with prejudice, and Defendant's counterclaim is dismissed without prejudice. As a result, the case is now closed. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 6/29/2010. (loh)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION
RUFUS BROWN, and MARIANNE BROWN, Plaintiffs, v. 609CV059
MARCO JAVIER ALVARADO, individually and d/b/a VIC TRANSPORT, Defendant/Counterclaimant, v. Rufus Brown, Counterdefendant.
ORDER The parties in this case have informed the Court that a settlement has been reached, and have requested that the case be dismissed and closed. See doc. # 29. Pursuant to their joint motion, Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and Defendant's counterclaim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. As a result, the case is now
CLOSED.
This day of 28 June 2010.
BAVANTPDENFIELØ,JUIJGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT cøur
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
