Field v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of this Court and dismissing Plaintiff's claim. for 10 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 5/17/2010. (loh)
HLED
C C' flT(' C'f'jU] ,j _J. L;) I C' ?'
Y 17 PM 12:00
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT C6dWY'JP-
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEOV
STATESBORO DIVISION
,DIS10FGA,
ROBERT FIELD, Plaintiff,
V.
CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV6I0-018
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, and SMITH STATE PRISON, Defendants.
ORDER
After an independent and de novo review of the record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which Objections have been filed. In his Objections, Plaintiff asserts that the Magistrate Judge's Report overlooked certain factual allegations in Plaintiff's complaint and that his claims against the Georgia Department of Corrections ("GDOC") and Smith State Prison should be allowed to proceed. As noted in the Report, the Eleventh Amendment immunizes the GDOC from suit, and Smith State Prison is not a legal entity subject to suit. Plaintiff's Objections are without merit and are OVERRULLED. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted as the opinion of the Court.
AO 72A (Rev. 8/82)
Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED. The Clerk is authorized and directed to enter the appropriate Judgment. SO ORDERED, this /4dayof ,2010.
B.AVANT E[ UNITED STA SOUTHERN
IELD, JUDGE DISTRICT COURT RICT OF GEORGIA
AO 72A (Rev. 8/2)
II
fl
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?