Newsome v. Ambrose et al
Filing
20
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of this Court dismissing this case without prejudice for 16 Report and Recommendations,. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 8/29/2011. (loh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIAJ!I
STATESBORO DIVISION
1:26
KENNETH T. NEWSOME, 11,
Plaintiff,
V.
CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV611-043
CHERRYL AMBROSE; KATHY
MARTIN; SANDRA MOORE;
Officer PALMER; Officer ROBINSON;
D. W. JOHNSON; STANLEY
WILLIAMS; SHAWN S1KES;
Ms. HOLLOWAY, Media Resource
Specialist; Nurse GRUBBS; and
Officer CHAMBLISS,
Defendants
ORDER
After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned
concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which Objections
have been filed. In his Objections, Plaintiff contends that he was assaulted on several
occasions and suffered injuries as a result. Even accepting as true the contentions
Plaintiff sets forth in his Objections, these contentions underscore the Magistrate
Judge's determination that Plaintiff was not in imminent danger of serious physical injury
at the time he filed his Complaint on May 6, 2011. Plaintiff sets forth events in his
Complaint and in his Objections which allegedly occurred either a few weeks before he
filed his Complaint or nearly two weeks after the filing of his Complaint.
AO 72A
(Rev. 8/82)
Plaintiffs Objections are without merit. The Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. Plaintiff's Complaint is
DISMISSED, without prejudice. Should Plaintiff wish to proceed with his contentions,
he may resubmit his Complaint along with the entire filing fee. The Clerk of Court is
authorized to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal.
SO ORDERED, this7¼of
,2011.
B. AVANT EDENFIELD,
UNITED STATES DISTI OCT COURT
SOUTHERN D1STRIC1' OF GEORGIA
AO 72A
(Rev. 8/82)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?