Newsome v. Ambrose et al

Filing 20

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of this Court dismissing this case without prejudice for 16 Report and Recommendations,. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 8/29/2011. (loh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIAJ!I STATESBORO DIVISION 1:26 KENNETH T. NEWSOME, 11, Plaintiff, V. CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV611-043 CHERRYL AMBROSE; KATHY MARTIN; SANDRA MOORE; Officer PALMER; Officer ROBINSON; D. W. JOHNSON; STANLEY WILLIAMS; SHAWN S1KES; Ms. HOLLOWAY, Media Resource Specialist; Nurse GRUBBS; and Officer CHAMBLISS, Defendants ORDER After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which Objections have been filed. In his Objections, Plaintiff contends that he was assaulted on several occasions and suffered injuries as a result. Even accepting as true the contentions Plaintiff sets forth in his Objections, these contentions underscore the Magistrate Judge's determination that Plaintiff was not in imminent danger of serious physical injury at the time he filed his Complaint on May 6, 2011. Plaintiff sets forth events in his Complaint and in his Objections which allegedly occurred either a few weeks before he filed his Complaint or nearly two weeks after the filing of his Complaint. AO 72A (Rev. 8/82) Plaintiffs Objections are without merit. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice. Should Plaintiff wish to proceed with his contentions, he may resubmit his Complaint along with the entire filing fee. The Clerk of Court is authorized to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal. SO ORDERED, this7¼of ,2011. B. AVANT EDENFIELD, UNITED STATES DISTI OCT COURT SOUTHERN D1STRIC1' OF GEORGIA AO 72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?