Reese v. United States Of America

Filing 20

ORDER stating that Reese's implied motions for COA and IFP status on appeal are denied for the reasons set for in the Report and Recommendation that this Court adopted. The Court assesses full filing fee of $455. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 3/26/2012 (loh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION DERRICK REESE, ) Movant, v. This 26th day of March 2012. 6:11-cv-57 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER Derrick Reese (“Reese”) has appealed this Court’s Order dismissing his U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See Doc. 18. The Court construes Reese’s notice of appeal as a request for a Certificate of Appealability (“COA”) and for in forma pauperis (“IFP”) status on appeal. See Edwards v. United States, 114 F.3d 1083, 1084 (11th Cir. 1997). The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court dismiss Reese’s § 2255 motion. at 11-12 (Report and See Doc. 12 Recommendation (“R&R”)). The Magistrate Judge also recommended that the Court deny Reese a COA and the ability to appeal IFP. See id. at 12-13. This Court adopted the R&R and dismissed Reese’s case. See Doc. 16. Reese’s implied motions are DENIED for the reasons set forth in the R&R. The Court assesses the full filing fee of $455. )?f''' R AVANT EDENFIELØ, JUDGE UNiTED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?