Reese v. United States Of America
Filing
20
ORDER stating that Reese's implied motions for COA and IFP status on appeal are denied for the reasons set for in the Report and Recommendation that this Court adopted. The Court assesses full filing fee of $455. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 3/26/2012 (loh)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
STATESBORO DIVISION
DERRICK REESE,
)
Movant,
v.
This 26th day of March 2012.
6:11-cv-57
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
ORDER
Derrick Reese (“Reese”) has appealed
this Court’s Order dismissing his U.S.C. §
2255 motion. See Doc. 18. The Court
construes Reese’s notice of appeal as a
request for a Certificate of Appealability
(“COA”) and for in forma pauperis (“IFP”)
status on appeal. See Edwards v. United
States, 114 F.3d 1083, 1084 (11th Cir.
1997).
The Magistrate Judge recommended that
the Court dismiss Reese’s § 2255 motion.
at 11-12 (Report and
See Doc. 12
Recommendation (“R&R”)). The
Magistrate Judge also recommended that the
Court deny Reese a COA and the ability to
appeal IFP. See id. at 12-13. This Court
adopted the R&R and dismissed Reese’s
case. See Doc. 16. Reese’s implied motions
are DENIED for the reasons set forth in the
R&R. The Court assesses the full filing fee
of $455.
)?f'''
R AVANT EDENFIELØ, JUDGE
UNiTED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?