Bacon v. Anderson et al

Filing 20

ORDER dismissing this complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 5/10/2012. (loh)

Download PDF
cj IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIfO? ti'V I P1 3 +5 STATESBORO DIVISION FRANKLIN LAMAR BACON, a/k/a Franklin Lamar Wilkerson, Plaintiff, V. CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV612-001 LYNN ANDERSON; Officer MARCO; Sgt. TREMBLE; Sgt. JEFF WHITE; JEFF THOMPSON; Mrs. FORMAND; Ms. RONDA; Cpl. AKINS; Ms. HOLLOWAY; Officer STANN; Officer RANDY; CHRIS WILLS; Officer CORI; Sgt. KIRKLAND; ADAM; DILLEN; PARKER; MORGAN; ANDRE; and Officer STEVE, Defendants ORDER Plaintiff Franklin Lamar Bacon a.k.a. Franklin Lamar Wilkerson ("Plaintiff"), an inmate currently incarcerated at Wilcox State Prison in Abbeville, Georgia, filed a cause of action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983, contesting certain conditions of his confinement at the Bulloch County Sheriff's Department. By Order dated February 7, 2012, Magistrate Judge Graham informed Plaintiff that his claims were unrelated and instructed Plaintiff to advise the Court as to which claim or related claims against which Defendant(s) he wishes to pursue in this action. AO 72A (Rev. 8/82) Plaintiff responded to the Magistrate Judge's February 7, 2012, Order. Plaintiffs Response suffered from the same defect as his original Complaint. By Order dated February 29, 2012, the Magistrate Judge again directed Plaintiff to advise the Court as to which claim or related claims against which Defendant(s) he wishes to pursue. Following an extension of time, Plaintiff has now filed two Responses to the Magistrate Judge's February 29, 2012, Order.' In his first Response, (Doc. Nos. 16 and 17), Plaintiff states that he wants to pursue the following claims: intentional interference with medical treatment once prescribed, deliberate indifference, starvation, intentional denial/delay of medical treatment, and tampering with medication before giving it to Plaintiff. Plaintiff seeks to retain the following Defendants: Lynn Anderson, Officer Marco, Sergeant Tremble, Jeff Thompson, Ms. Ronda, Corporal Cori Akins, Ms. Holloway, Officer Con, Sergeant Kirkland, Adam, Dillen, Parker, Morgan, Andre, and Officer Steve. In his second Response, (Doc. No. 19), Plaintiff again alleges that he was starved and denied medical treatment. Plaintiff also alleges that he was served cold food, which resulted in constipation and hemorrhoids. Additionally, Plaintiff re-alleges that his prescribed medical treatment was interfered with; he alleges that the cause of this interference was racial discrimination. Plaintiff also avers that Officer Morgan, who is not a named defendant, refused to give him a double portion of food; Plaintiff alleges that racial discrimination was the cause of Officer Morgan's denial. Plaintiff summarizes this document by stating he wants to pursue all health care claims. Plaintiff still fails to show a logical relationship between his many claims. Plaintiff has yet to properly comply with the Magistrate Judge's Orders instructing him to advise 'The first Response was docketed as a Motion to Amend Plaintiffs Complaint and as a Response. AO 72A (Rev. 8/82) the Court as to which related claims, claims that "arise[ ] out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences," FED. R. Civ. P. 20(a), he wishes to pursue. As a result, Plaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter the appropriate judgment of dismi al. SO ORDERED, this Aay of '' //)4 (I , 2012. dfd -;-,ta T. AVA EDENFIELD, 4LIDG UNITED STATES DISTPi)tT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AO 72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?