Grange Mutual Insurance Company v. Dasher et al

Filing 41

ORDER granting 40 Motion to Dismiss. The case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 1/22/13. (wwp)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION GRANGE MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Grange's motion is GRANTED and this DISMISSED WITHOUT is case PREJUDICE. Thi sW of January 2013. Plaintiff, V . 6: 12-cv-63 SHAD DASHER, individually; KARIN DASHER, individually; VIDALIA ORGANICS, INC. a/Wa SHAD and KARIN DASHER d/b/a GLENN VILLE PRODUCE CO.; MARIA SERRANO; J. ENEDINO FAJARDOCEBALLOS; KATHLEEN WAGNER, CHARLES WAGNER, JOSEPH BLAKE; METROPOLITAN GROUP PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE, Defendants. ORDER Before the Court is Grange Mutual Casualty Company's ("Grange") Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a).' ECF No. 40. Defendants have not stipulated to Grange's motion to dismiss, but Defendants have previously sought dismissal themselves. See ECF No. 30. Grange also asserts that most of the claims underlying this declaratory judgment action 'have been settled and are moot." ECF No. 40 at 1. The Court therefore finds no compelling reason for this action to live to see another day. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) allows plaintiffs to request dismissal by court order, on terms that the court considers proper." I 724' B. AVANT EDENFIEL Ø JUD E UNITED STATES DIR1CT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?