Hodges et al v. King America Finishing, Inc. et al

Filing 21

ORDER granting 19 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 9/12/2012. (loh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION I. GREGORY HODGES, CYNTHIA D. HODGES, DAN R. TAULBEE, REMER D. CLIFTON, JOHN T. HODGES, M.D., L. INMAN HODGES, SR., W.M. SHEPPARD PROPERTIES, LLLP, and L.A. WATERS FARM PROPERTIES, LLC, Civil Action No. 6:1 2-cv-00073-LGW-GRS Plaintiffs, V. KING AMERICA FINISHING, INC., MICHAEL ALBERT BEASLEY and WESTEX HOLDING COMPANY, Defendants. ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Stay Proceedings. Plaintiffs have moved that all proceedings in this case be stayed pending a ruling on Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand. In support of their Motion, Plaintiffs show that Defendants presently have a Motion to Dismiss pending. Plaintiffs have also referenced the requirements imposed by the Local Rules of this Court that would not be imposed upon the parties in the event Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand is granted. According to Plaintiffs, each of these reasons supports staying proceedings in this case until there has been a ruling on the Motion to Remand in the interest of economy to both the Court and the parties. In their Brief filed in support of their Motion to Sta', Plaintiffs have indicated that Defendants do not oppose the Motion to Stay. FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, Plaintiffs motion is hereby GRANTED. All proceedings and deadlines, including Plaintiffs' obligation to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and the In parties' obligation to participate in a Rule 26(f) Conference, are hereby stayed until such time as there has been a ruling upon Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand. SO ORDERED, THIS J Q( DA Y OF SEPTEMBER, 2012. H.SMITH United States Magistrate Judge Order prepared by: George T. Major, Jr. Georgia Bar No. 619608 OLIVER MANER LLP 218 West State Street P.O. Box 10186 Savannah, Georgia 31412 (912)236-3311

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?