Mapp v. Jarriel et al

Filing 63

ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against the Plaintiff Al Rico Mapp. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 3/6/2014. (loh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION AL RICO MAPP, GDC# 841886 Plaintiff, Case No. CV6:12-103 V. rr JAVAKA JOHNSON JARVIS SAPP EDWARD WATERS (I) Defendants. ORDER AND JUDGMENT OF THE COURT The Plaintiff, Al Rico Mapp, through counsel, filed this action complaining that the Defendants violated his constitutional rights to cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Plaintiff originally sued seven defendants, all employees of the Georgia Department of Corrections. Four of the defendants were dismissed as were the claims against Edward Waters, Javaka Johnson and Jarvis Sapp in their official capacities by order of the Court on April 15, 2013. (ECF 30). After discovery, the Court scheduled the case for trial on the remaining claims on March 4, 2014. On March 4, 2014 a jury was empanelled, evidence was presented and closed, the jury was charged and a verdict was entered subsequent to deliberations by the jury. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Defendants on all counts. 1 -I. The clerk will tax the cost in favor of the Defendants and against Plaintiff, Mapp. In accordance with the verdict of the jury, without objection as to form by the Plaintiff, judgment is ENTERED in favor of the Defendants and against the Plaintiff, Al Rico Mapp. So Ordered this Day of March, 2014. The Ho&ithbIe B. Ac'ahtIenfie1d Judge, United States D)irict Court Southern District of georgia 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?