Helton v. Johnson et al

Filing 9

ORDER stating that plaintiff has failed to respond to the Court's January 2, 2013, Order. Accordingly, Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 2/14/2013. (loh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION RANDY HELTON, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV612-104 V. FNU JOHNSON; RALPH KEMP; and MS. JACKSON, Defendants ORDER By Order dated November 28, 2012, this Court allowed the Plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis with an action filed pursuant to the provisions of 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. In a subsequent Order dated January 2, 2013, the Plaintiff was instructed to advise the Court as to which claims against which Defendant(s) he wished to pursue. Plaintiff was advised that his failure to respond properly to that Order would result in the dismissal of his complaint. The Plaintiff has failed to respond to the Court's January 2, 2013, Order. Accordingly, Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is authorized and directed to enter an appropriate Judgment of dismissal. SO ORDERED, this day of , 2013. COURT UNITED STATES bTh1 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AO 72A (Rev. 8182)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?