Helton v. Johnson et al
Filing
9
ORDER stating that plaintiff has failed to respond to the Court's January 2, 2013, Order. Accordingly, Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 2/14/2013. (loh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
STATESBORO DIVISION
RANDY HELTON,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV612-104
V.
FNU JOHNSON; RALPH KEMP;
and MS. JACKSON,
Defendants
ORDER
By Order dated November 28, 2012, this Court allowed the Plaintiff to proceed in forma
pauperis with an action filed pursuant to the provisions of 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. In a subsequent
Order dated January 2, 2013, the Plaintiff was instructed to advise the Court as to which
claims against which Defendant(s) he wished to pursue. Plaintiff was advised that his failure
to respond properly to that Order would result in the dismissal of his complaint. The Plaintiff
has failed to respond to the Court's January 2, 2013, Order. Accordingly, Plaintiff's complaint
is DISMISSED without prejudice.
The Clerk of Court is authorized and directed to enter an appropriate Judgment of
dismissal.
SO ORDERED, this
day of
, 2013.
COURT
UNITED STATES bTh1
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
AO 72A
(Rev. 8182)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?