Toor v. Moralas et al

Filing 19

ORDER ADOPTING the 16 Report and Recommendations dismissing the case. The Plaintiff's motion to reopen case CV613-48 is granted. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 7/25/13. (wwp)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION GURPARTAP S1NGH TOOR, Petitioner, V. 6: 13-cv-48 6:13-cv-51 JOSE MORALES, Warden Defendant. Before the Court is Gurpartap Toor's motion to reopen this case. ECF No. 10. The Court originally dismissed this case because Toor failed to pay the $5 filing fee. ECF No. 8. Toor now seeks to have the filing fee he paid in another case currently pending applied to this action. Id. In that other case is a Report and Recommendation, ripe for consideration, from the Magistrate Judge counseling dismissal because Toor sought to challenge a state conviction in a 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 petition. See Toor v. Morales, No. 6:13-cv-51, at ECF No. 16 (S.D. Ga. July 8, 2013). The Court agrees with the Magistrate and ADOPTS the R&R as the opinion of the Court. Case number 6:1 3-cv51 is DISMISSED. In light of (1) Toor's payment of the filing fee in an action where he improperly challenged a state conviction, and (2) his failure to pay the filing fee in this action, where he properly challenged the same conviction on the same grounds, the Court GRANTS Toor's motion to reopen and WAIVES the filing fee in Toor v. Morales, Case No. 6:13-cv-48. Th-ay of July, 2013 B(AVANT'EIYENFIELD, JUD UNITED STATES DISTRIC7tOURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?