HOLMES v. Williams, et al

Filing 23

ORDER adopting portion of Magistrate Judge's 22 Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court; denying 7 Motion for Permanent Injunction and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order; denying 12 Motion for Help; denying 15 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order; and, additionally reminding Plaintiff of his obligation to show cause, within thirty (30) days of the date of the Magistrate Judge's Order and Report and Recommendation, why this action should not be dismissed for Plaintiff's failure to truthfully disclose his litigation history. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 8/13/2015. (jah)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION DERRICK PAUL HOLMES, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV615-012 v. WARDEN STANLEY WILLIAMS; MR. MOURAD; JAMES DEAL; MR. SMOKES; MS. MARTIN; SARGENT CAS; EARL TOPPINGS; RICHARD BUNCH; JOHNNY DAVIS; ERIC YONG; CARLOS DELGADO; OFFICER WEST; UNIT MANAGER BLAND; OFFICER SANDERS; DR. COOK; CERT TEAM WHITEFIELD; OFFICER GEORGE; UNKNOWN CERT TEAM MEMBERS; OFFICER JONES; UNKNOWN SMITH STATE PRISON NURSES; TOOL; TOUCHA; COCHA; BRIAN OWENS; and NATHAN DEAL, Defendants. ORDER Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Order and Report and Recommendation issued on June 20, 2015. (Doc. 22.) Therein, the Magistrate Judge ordered Plaintiff to show cause, within thirty days, why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiffs failure to truthfully disclose his litigation history. (Id. at pp. 10-11.) Additionally, the Magistrate Judge reviewed several motions for injunctive relief filed by Plaintiff and recommended that those Motions be denied. (Id at pp. 13-17.) The Report and Recommendation made clear that if Plaintiff sought to object to the denial of his Motions for injunctive relief, he must file his objections within fourteen days. (Id. at p. 18.) That deadline has now passed, and Plaintiff has not filed any objections. After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation on Plaintiffs Motions for injunctive relief, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, that portion of the Magistrate Judge's Order and Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Plaintiffs Motion for Permanent Injunction, Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (doc. 7); Motion for Help (doc. 12); and Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (doc. 15) are hereby DENIED. Additionally, the Court once again reminds Plaintiff of his obligation to show cause, within thirty (30) days of the date of the Magistrate Judge's Order and Report and Recommendation, why this action should not be dismissed for Plaintiffs failure to truthfully disclose his litigation history. Should Plaintiff fail to meet that obligation, the Court may dismiss this action. SO ORDERED, this A^cfe ofAugust, 2015. HON^RA^pTRANDAL HALL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?