Taylor v. United States of America

Filing 7

ORDER granting 6 Motion to Reply re 4 Response. Taylor has twenty one days from the date this Order is served to place her reply in her prisoner reply mail system. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 8/31/2015. (loh)

Download PDF
Lc. .,/ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION TIDAESHA V. TAYLOR, ) ) Movant, V. ) ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. CV615-026 ) ) Respondent. ) ORDER Four months after the government filed its response to her 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 motion, Tidaesha Taylor, unaware of the Court's reply brief policy,' moves for leave to file a reply. Doc. 6. Given that policy, her motion is GRANTED. Taylor has 21 days from the date this Order is served to place her reply in her prison's mail system. SO ORDERED, this 3/ay of August, 2015. UNITEt) STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 1 See Waddy v. Globus Med., Inc., 2008 WL 3861994 (S.D. Ga. Aug 18, 2008) (the "parties may file as many reply briefs as they like under Local Rule 7.5.") (citing Podger v. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp., 212 F.R.D. 609, 609 (S.D. Ga. 2003)); see also L.R. 7.6 (authorizing reply briefs but imposing notice requirements and time limits).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?