Lester v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al

Filing 13

ORDER adopting 9 Report and Recommendations. Therefore, Plaintiff's claims against the Georgia Department of Corrections, Captain Mobley, and Officer Hill are dismissed. This case shall proceed against Defendant Williams in his individual capacity. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 2/5/16. (cmr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION LAYTON LESTER, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 6:15-cv-l 10 v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; CAPTAIN MOBLEY; OFFICER C. WILLIAMS; and OFFICER HILL, Defendants. ORDER After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, (doc. 9) to which no Objections have been filed.1 Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation ofthe Magistrate Judge is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiffs claims against the Georgia Department of Corrections, Captain Mobley, and Officer Hill. Additionally, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's official capacity claims, supervisory liability claims, and his claims for excessive use of force. However, Plaintiffs claims that Defendant C. Williams disregarded Plaintiffs serious medical 1 Plaintiff has filed a declaration since the Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 12.) However, this pleading does not address the Report and Recommendation. Further, the declaration only offers additional facts in support of Plaintiffs claims that Defendant Williams was deliberately indifferent to Plaintiffs medical needs. The Magistrate Judge recommended those claims should proceed. needs and disregarded a substantial risk to Plaintiffs health and safety shall proceed against Defendant Williams in his individual capacity. SO ORDERED, this* iisĀ«=^ davof C JrJrCvL HONORABLE^ RANDAL HALL UNITED?TATES DISTRICT JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?