Hoke v. Lyle et al

Filing 62

ORDER ADOPTING 61 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the U.S. Magistrate Judge as the opinion of this Court. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiffs claims against Defendants Lane, Dozier, Allen, and Pinero and his claims brought under Georgia law. The Court als o GRANTS Defendants Lyte, Henry, and Williams Motion to Dismiss, 52 ), DISMISSES Plaintiff's Complaint 1 , DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and CLOSE this case, and DENIES Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 9/16/19. (jrb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
STATESBORO DIVISION

STEPHEN RAY HOKE,
Plaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 6:16-cv-45

v.
MR. LYTE, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER
After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with
the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, (doc. 61). Plaintiff did not file Objections
to the Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation as
the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Lane,
Dozier, Allen, and Pinero and his claims brought under Georgia law. The Court also GRANTS
Defendants Lyte, Henry, and Williams’ Motion to Dismiss, (doc. 52), DISMISSES Plaintiff’s
Complaint, DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and
CLOSE this case, and DENIES Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis.
SO ORDERED, this 16th day of September, 2019.

R. STAN BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA