McKenzie v. Berry
ORDER ADOPTING 24 Report and Recommendations, GRANTING 14 Motion to Dismiss filed by Walter Berry, DISMISSING McKenzie's 2254 Petition, DENYING McKenzie in forma pauperis status on appeal and a Certificate of Appealability, and CLOSING this case. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 03/07/2017. (maa)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL MCKENZIE
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 6:16-cv-48
WARDEN WALTER BERRY,
After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs
with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, (doc. 24), to which Christopher
McKenzie ("McKenzie") filed Objections. In his Objections, McKenzie asserts that, once he
learned of his attorney's ineffective assistance in 2014, he began pursuing his rights diligently.
(Doc. 25, p. 1.) However, McKenzie knew of or should have known of the facts underlying his
ineffective assistance of counsel claims no later than November 10, 2011, which was the date of
his conviction and sentence. McKenzie offers no explanation why he waited nearly three years
after his conviction became final on December 10, 2011, to file a state habeas corpus petition on
October 22, 2014, nor does McKenzie otherwise show that he was pursuing his rights diligently
prior to thatfiling. The Court OVERRULES McKenzie's Objections.
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as
the opinion of the Court. The Court GRANTS Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, (doc. 14),
DISMISSES McKenzie's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, DIRECTS the
Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal, and
DENIES McKenzie informa pauperis status on appeal and a Certificate of Appealability.
SO ORDERED, this
day of March, 2017.
HONORABLE J. RANDAL HALL
UNITED SPATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?