Castillo v. Johnson et al
Filing
28
ORDER granting 27 Motion for Permission to file under seal. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 01/09/2017. (maa)
IN THE UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
STATESBORO DIVISION
WILLIAM NAVARRO CASTILLO,
*
Plaintiff,
*
v.
NURSE STRICKLAND;
*
and OFFICER
CV 616-049
*
BRANTLEY.
*
Defendants.
*
ORDER
By Order dated August
United States Marshals
Strickland
with
a
8,
2016,
the Court directed
the
Service to serve Defendants Brantley and
copy
of
Plaintiff's
Complaint
based
on
Plaintiff's allegations that Defendant Brantley used excessive
force
against
Brantley
and
Plaintiff's
Plaintiff
on May 1,
Strickland
resultant
serious
Clerk of Court prepared
States
Marshals
were
Service
2014,
deliberately
medical
USM-285
with
Answer
On October 11,
Motion
(Docs. 10,
to
16, 17.)
2016,
Dismiss
to
needs.
forms
to
Defendants
indifferent
(Doc.
assist
effectuation
Defendants Brantley and Strickland.
2016.)
and that
of
8.)
to
The
the United
service
(Dkt. Entry dated Aug.
on
8,
Defendant Strickland filed a prewhich
Plaintiff
has
responded.
On November 8, 2016, Defendant Strickland
filed a Motion to Stay Discovery pending the Court's resolution
of
15,
her
Motion
2016.
to
Dismiss,
15,
November
On
(Docs.
10,
which
the
Court
granted
on
November
19.)
2016,
the
United
States
Marshals
Service
Return as to
Defendant Brantley was returned as unexecuted with
the
that
notation
was
not
informed
name"
the
Defendant
that
Marshals
working
Accordingly,
last
and
found
a
at
known
address
personnel
Service
Georgia
there
State
for
at
Defendant
Georgia
was
or
is
Prison.
Brantley
State
"no
Prison
by
that
18,
(Doc.
one
at
1.)
on December 19, 2016, the Court ordered counsel for
Strickland,
Mr.
David Grossman,
inter alia,
to,
reasonable efforts to obtain a name and an address
make
for Defendant
Brantley so that he might be served with Plaintiff's Complaint
and to notify the Court of the results of his efforts.
24, at 2.)
the
On January 4, 2017, Mr. Grossman filed a notice with
Court
belief,
indicating
"Defendant
Department
of
Brantley.1
that,
to the
Brantley"
Corrections
(Doc.
26,
best
refers
("GDC")
at 1.)
Mr.
of
to
his
a
employee,
knowledge
former
Mr.
unable
that Mr.
his
locate
a
current
Christopher
Grossman also informed the
address
Brantley has not responded
last
1 In Mr.
to
known
address.
Grossman's
notice
Mr.
to
the
for
Mr.
he
also
refers
to
that he
Brantley,
to correspondence
Grossman
Court,
and
Georgia
Court that he does not currently represent Mr. Brantley,
was
(Doc.
filed
and
sent to
a
motion
Defendant
Brantley
interchangeably as Mr. "Christopher Bradley" and "Officer Brantley,"
(See
Doc. 26, at 1 (emphasis added).)
Mr. Grossman's references to Defendant
Brantley by the last name "Bradley" appear to be simple scrivener's errors.
(Compare Doc.
26;
with Doc.
27
(identifying Defendant Brantley solely as
"Christopher Brantley").)
2
requesting permission to
for Mr.
Brantley,
file under seal the last
citing concerns for the privacy and safety of
this former corrections officer.
Upon due consideration,
IT
IS
motion
HEREBY
(doc.
ORDERED
27)
that
Brantley's
seal
and until
(Doc.
27.)
and out of an abundance of caution,
counsel
is GRANTED,
Christopher
unless
known address
last
further
for
and his
known
Defendant
forthcoming notice of
address
order
Strickland's
of the
shall
Court.
be
IT
kept
IS
Mr.
under
FURTHER
ORDERED that, upon counsel for Defendant Strickland's filing of
notice of Mr. Christopher Brantley's last known address with the
Clerk of
this
Court,
a copy of
Plaintiff's
Complaint
and a copy of the Court's Order dated August 8,
shall be served upon Mr.
(doc.
1)
2016 (doc.
8)
Brantley at his last known address by
the United States Marshals Service without prepayment of cost.
ORDER ENTERED at Augusta,
January,
Georgia,
this
/^^ day of
2017.
Jp\J. RAM DAL HALL
FATES
DISTRICT JUDGE
^HERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?