Williams v. Georgia Department of Corrections Commissioner et al
ORDER overruling objections, adopting 24 Report and Recommendations, and denying Plaintiff in forma pauperis status on appeal. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to close this case and enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 08/28/2017. (thb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 6:16-cv-106
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS COMMISSIONER; DR.
CHEN; ENDOCRINOLOGIST 2-DR. X; DR.
ALETA GARDNER; P.A. COOPER;
CHRONIC CARE NURSE X; DEPUTY
WARDEN SMITH; TERRI YARBROUGH;
SMITH STATE PRISON HEALTH CARE
SERVICES; LIBRARIAN X; and SGT.
NOVY, all in their individual and official
After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs
with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, (doc. 24), to which Plaintiff filed
"Objections", (doc. 25). In his Objections, which are untimely, Plaintiff once again takes issue
with the Magistrate Judge's exercise ofjurisdiction. However, this pleading is hardly responsive
to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.
The Court OVERRULES Plaintiffs Objections, and accordingly, ADOPTS the
Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court.
DISMISSES Plaintiffs Complaint for failure to follow this Court's Orders and failure to
prosecute and DENIES Plaintiff informa pauperis status on appeal.
The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and enter the appropriate
judgment of dismissal.
SO ORDERED, this _^M_clay ofAugust, 2017.
/ J. RANDAt/HALL, CHIEFJUDGE
UNITED^TATES DISTRICT COURT
iRN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?