Floyd v. Berry et al
ORDER adopting 12 Report and Recommendations; Therefore, denying 13 Motion for Discovery. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiffs Complaint without prejudice and DENIES Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. This case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 12/19/16. (cmr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
EDDIE FRANK FLOYD, III,
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 6:16-cv-l 19
KIMBERLA BERRY; DOUG WILLIAMS,
Warden; MRS. CUCUMBER, Kitchen
Director; and MRS. COOK, Kitchen Director,
Presently before the Court are Plaintiffs Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation dated November 4, 2016, (doc. 12). After an independent and de novo review
of the entire record, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.
The Court notes Plaintiffs Objection that he attempted to comply with the Court's directives to
submit his prisontrust fund account information but was unable to do so. However, Plaintiffhas
still not submitted his prisontrust fund account information, despite the Court giving him several
opportunities to do so. Moreover, as the Magistrate Judge advised Plaintiff on more than one
occasion, the Court is unable to proceed with this case without Plaintiffs financial information.
(Id at pp. 4-5.)
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS theMagistrate Judge's Report andRecommendation as
the opinion of the Court and OVERRULES Plaintiffs Objections. The Court DISMISSES
Plaintiffs Complaint without prejudice and DENIES Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma
pauperis on appeal.
The Court DISMISSES as moot Plaintiffs Motion for Discovery.
(Doc. 13.) The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter the appropriate judgment of
dismissal and to CLOSE this case.
SO ORDERED, this jr\m ofDecember, 2016.
HONORABLE^ RANDAL HALL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?