Brown v. United States Of America et al
Filing
8
ORDER granting 5 Motion to Substitute Party. The United States shall be substituted as a defendant for Ms. Pittman. Melinda Foskey Pittman terminated. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 10/17/2016. (thb)
IN THE UNITED
FOR THE
STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
STATESBORO DIVISION
TERICA BIANCA BROWN,
*
Individually, and as Next
*
Friend and Natural
of C.B.,
Guardian
*
a minor,
*
Plaintiff,
*
*
v.
*
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
MELINDA FOSKEY PITTMAN,
and
CV
616-133
*
*
Defendants,
ORDER
Currently
America's
United
Melinda
before
motion
States
to
the
Court
is
(Doc.
substitute.
wishes
to
be
the
5.)
substituted
Foskey Pittman under 28
U.S.C.
United
States
Specifically,
as
a
defendant
§ 2679.
of
the
for
Section 2679
provides that a claim against the United States is the exclusive
remedy
for
injuries
sustained
as
a
result
of
the
acts
or
omissions of an employee of the United States acting within the
scope
of
his
or
her
employment.
28
U.S.C.
§ 2679(b).
Accordingly,
[u]pon certification by the Attorney General that the
defendant employee was acting within the scope of his
office or employment at the time of the incident out
of
which
the
claim
arose,
any
civil
action
or
proceeding
States
commenced
district
upon
court
such
shall
be
claim
in
a
United
an
deemed
action
against the United States under the provisions of this
title
and all
references
thereto,
and
the
United
States shall be substituted as the party defendant.
28
U.S.C.
§ 2679(d)(1).
certified,
see
within
scope
the
be
the
United
28
C.F.R.
of
States'
SUBSTITUTED
as
Here,
§ 15.4,
her
United
that
employment.
motion
a
the
is
defendant
GRANTED.
for Ms.
Ms.
(Dc.
The
States
Attorney
Pittman
was
has
acting
5-1.)
Accordingly,
United
States
Pittman,
and Ms.
shall
Pittman
shall be TERMINATED as a party in this case.
ORDER
October,
ENTERED
at
Augusta,
Georgia
this
//*** day
2016.
HONORABJftTJ. RANDAL HALE
UNITED STATES
SOUTHERN
DISTRICT
JUDGE
DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
of
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?