United States of America v. Southern Tobacco Company
Filing
10
ORDER granting 8 Motion Consent Motion for Entry of Consent Judgment. The Court Orders that final judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Defendantshall pay Plaintiff the principal sum of $30,459.14 under the Settlement Agreement plus post-judgment interest at the legal rate per annum from the date this Consent Judgment is entered. This Consent Judgment fullyadjudicates all of the claims and causes of action in this matter, including those pleaded and those which could have been pleaded. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 02/03/2017. (thb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
STATESBORO DIVISION
*
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
*
Plaintiff,
*
*
CV
616-152
SOUTHERN TOBACCO COMPANY,
d.b.a, HOOKAH HOOKAH TOBACCO
COMPANY,
Defendant,
*
*
ORDER
Presently before
the
Court
is parties'
Entry of Consent Judgment
(doc.
8)
Civil
Procedure
settlement
issues,
been
be
58.
("Settlement
accordance
in
with
favor
of
Federal
Agreement")
resolving
the Court ORDERS that
Plaintiff
Rule
of
for
entered into a
and demands set forth in the Complaint.
advised accordingly,
entered
Motion
pursuant to Federal Rule of
Plaintiff and Defendant have
agreement
claims,
Consent
and
Civil
final
against
Procedure
all
Having
judgment
Defendant
58.
in
Defendant
shall pay Plaintiff the principal sum of $30,459.14 under the
Settlement Agreement plus post-judgment interest at the legal
rate per annum from the date this Consent Judgment is entered.
IT
IS
FURTHER
adjudicates
all
ORDERED
of
the
that
claims
this
Consent
and causes
of
Judgment
action
fully
in this
matter,
including those pleaded and those which could have been
pleaded.
This
consent
action may be
amended only by agreement
of the parties and approval by the Court.
ORDER
February,
ENTERED
at
Augusta,
Georgia,
this
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?