Jordan v. Rogers State Prison et al
Filing
23
ORDER ADOPTING 20 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed, all pending motions are dismissed as moot, and Plaintiff is denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. This case stands closed. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 08/31/2017. (pts)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
STATESBORO DIVISION
CRAIG A. JORDAN,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 6:17-cv-25
v.
ROGERS STATE PRISON; WARDEN
CLAY TATUM; FNU MCFARLAND;
JENNIFER CLARKE; FNU STANKOWITZ;
SHELIA HOLLAND; CINDY REYES; and
JEWELL MOORE,
Defendants.
ORDER
After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs
with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, (doc. 20), to which Plaintiff failed to
file Objections.1 Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiffs Complaint,
DISMISSES AS MOOT all pending Motions, and DENIES Plaintiff leave to proceed informa
pauperis on appeal. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter an appropriate judgment
of dismissal and to CLOSE this case.
SO ORDERED, this ^ZfTday of August, 2017.
JUDGE
UNITED SPATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
1 Instead, Plaintiff filed a Motion to File, Accept, and Serve Attached Summons, (doc. 21). However,
even under the most liberal reading, Plaintiffs filing cannot be construed as Objections. Plaintiff fails to
even mention the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation in this filing.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?