Wright v. Core Civic's Policy et al

Filing 7

ORDER adopting 4 Report and Recommendations. Therefore, the Plaintiff's complaint is Dismissed and this civil action stands Closed. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 5/26/17. (cmr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION WILLIE FRANK WRIGHT, JR., Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 6:17-cv-27 v. CORE CIVICS POLICY, et al, Defendants. ORDER Presently before the Court are Plaintiffs Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated March 22, 2017, (doc. 4). After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court and OVERRULES Plaintiffs Objections. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiffs Complaint based on Plaintiffs lack ofcandor1 and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. The Court DENIES Plaintiff leave to proceed informa pauperis on appeal. SO ORDERED, this /yt/p^tes of May, 2017. JUDGE uinited states district court Southern district of Georgia 1 The Court notes Plaintiffs assertion that his failure to disclose previous lawsuits is not relevant in an emergency situation such as his. (Doc. 6, p. 1.) Plaintiff had a duty todisclose his previous lawsuits and willfully disregarded that duty. This Court will not tolerate such disregard and lack ofcandor.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?