Pierce v. The State of Georgia et al

Filing 9

ORDER adopting 7 Report and Recommendations. Therefore, the Clerk is directed to entered judgment of dismissal and Close this case. Further, the Court denies Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 5/26/17. (cmr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

STATESBORO DIVISION

CASEY DANIEL PIERCE,
Plaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 6:17-cv-31

v.

THE STATE OF GEORGIA; MARTY C.
ALLEN; and TONYA JOHNSON,
Defendants.

ORDER

After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs

with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, (doc. 7), to which Plaintiff filed an

Objection, (doc. 8). Plaintiffs Objection is merely a reiteration of the claims he originally set

forth in his Complaint which the Magistrate Judge correctly discussed. Accordingly, the Court
CONCURS with the Magistrate Judge, ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation as the

opinion of the Court, and OVERRULES Plaintiffs Objections. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk
of Court to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. Further, the
Court DENIES Plaintiff leave to proceed informapauperis on appeal.

SO ORDERED, this^o^dav ofMay, 2017.

j. ranbialhale; chief judge
UINITEDSTATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF GEORGIA