Johnson v. Orchard Health and Rehabiliation

Filing 12

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS dismissing re 1 Complaint filed by Stephanie L. Johnson. Objections to R&R due by 8/18/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 8/4/17. (jlm)

®

FILED
U.S^DiSTR!CT COUR f

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SAVANNAH DtV;

ah 9:3^

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
r? i. f

STATESBORO DIVISION

V-L.Ll\.v

STEPHANIE L. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,
CV617-039

ORCHARD HEALTH AND

REHABILITATION,
Defendant.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court granted pro se plaintiff Stephanie Johnson a reduction

of the normal filing fee based on her financial need and allowed her to
pay the reduced fee in instalments. See doc. 10. It warned her that any
default might result in a recommendation of dismissal. Id. at 3. Johnson

made no payment. The Court then provided her with a final opportunity

to make the required payments and to show cause why she had failed to
comply with the Court's prior Order. See doc. 11. Johnson, again, failed
to respond. Since she has failed to comply with multiple Court orders

and to prosecute her case, it should be DISMISSED. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
41(b); S.D. Ga. L.R. 41.1(c).

This Report and Recommendation (R&R) is submitted to the

district judge assigned to this action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(B) and this Court's Local Rule 72.3.

Within 14 days of

service, any party may file written objections to this R&R with the Court
and serve a copy on all parties. The document should be captioned
"Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations." Any
request for additional time to file objections should be filed with the
Clerk for consideration by the assigned district judge.

After the objections period has ended, the Clerk shall submit this
R&R together with any objections to the assigned district judge. The

district judge will review the magistrate judge's findings and
recommendations pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The parties are

advised that failure to timely file objections will result in the waiver of
rights on appeal. 11th Cir. R. 3-1; see Symonett v. V.A. Leasing Corp.,
648 F. App'x 787, 790 (11th Cir. 2016); Mitchell v. U.S., 612 F. App'x
542, 545(11th Cir. 2015).

J)

SO REPORTED AND RECOMMENDED,this^ay of August,
2017.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA