Jackson v. Logan et al

Filing 9

ORDER adopting 7 Report and Recommendations, dismissing the complaint without prejudice, based on Plaintiff's failure to prosecute and follow this Court's Orders, and denying Plaintiff in forma pauperis on appeal. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to close this case and enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 08/31/2017. (thb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION TRACY LAMONT JACKSON, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 6:17-cv-52 v. SERGEANT DELVIN LOGAN; et al, Defendants. ORDER After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, (doc. 7), to which Plaintiff failed to file Objections.1 Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiffs Complaint, without prejudice, based on Plaintiffs failure to prosecute and failure to follow this Court's Orders. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal. The Court DENIES Plaintiff informa pauperis status on appeal. SO ORDERED, this ^j/^'dav ofAugust, 2017. IEF JUDGE UINITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 1 In lieu of filing Objections, Plaintiff submitted an Amended Complaint, (doc. 21), on June 21, 2017. However, even ifthe Court considered Plaintiffs Amended Complaint timely filed, this action would still be subject to dismissal. While Plaintiff states in his Amended Complaint that the facts underlying his claims are attached to a separate sheet of paper, Plaintiff did not submit any additional document outlining the facts supporting his claims. Accordingly, Plaintiff has still failed to comply with the Court's May 3, 2017, Orderto properly amend his Complaint.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?