Neville v. McCaghren
Filing
83
ORDER finding the fees sought by Ms. Cox and Mr. Lavoie to be reasonable in both time spent and rate charged re [81-1] Affidavit of Susan W. Cox; therefore, attorneys' fees in the amount of $1,750.00 are awarded to Defendant for her expenses incurred as a result of the Rule 11 motion for sanctions. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 03/07/2019. (jlh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
STATESBORO DIVISION
*
ROBERT NEVILLE,
*
*
Plaintiff,
*
*
V.
CV 617-075
■k
*
ELIZABETH C. MCCAGHREN,
*
Defendant.
*
*
ORDER
On January
3,
2019,
the Court
entered an Order
imposing
sanctions on Plaintiff Robert Neville for engaging ^^in a systematic
pattern of harassment" of Defendant Elizabeth McCaghren and her
counsel and for ignoring the Court's instructions by repeatedly
filing frivolous motions.
16.)
The
sanctions.
Court
also
(Order of Jan. 3, 2019, Doc. 78, at 15-
granted
(Id. at 15 n.6. )
in
part
Defendant's
motion
for
Defendant sought attorney's fees and
costs incurred over multiple lawsuits between her and Plaintiff,
but the Court found that request to be too broad under Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 11(c) (2) .
(Id. )
Instead,
Defendant was
invited to submit a statement of attorney's fees and costs incurred
in connection with her Rule 11 motion for sanctions.
Defendant
has
$1,750.00 in fees.
now
filed
an
itemized
affidavit
requesting
(Aff. of Susan W. Cox ('^Cox Aff.") ,
Doc.
81-
1, ^ 11.)
That total represents 7.5 hours billed by Andrew Lavoie
at a rate of $225.00 per hour and 0.25 hours billed by Susan Cox
at a rate of $250.00 per hour. (Id. If 4, 7-11.)
Plaintiff has
not responded or objected to Ms. Cox's affidavit, despite being
provided an opportunity to do so.
(See Order of Jan. 3, 2019, at
17.)
A court may award attorney's fees solely by looking to the
record.
Norman v. Hous. Auth. of City of Montgomery, 836 F.2d
1292, 1303 (11th Cir. 1988).
To set the amount of recoverable
attorney's fees, the Court must first determine a lodestar, which
is calculated ^^by multiplication of a reasonable hourly rate times
hours reasonably expended."
Id. at 1302.
"A reasonable hourly
rate is the prevailing market rate in the relevant legal community
for similar services by lawyers of reasonably comparable skills,
experience, and reputation." Id. at 1299 (citing Blum v. Stenson,
465 U.S. 886, 895-96 n.ll (1984)).
Reasonable hours are presented
when the fee applicant exercises ''billing judgment" and excludes
any "'excessive, redundant or otherwise unnecessary' hours" from
the amount sought.
Id. at 1301 (quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461
U.S. 424, 434-37 (1983)).
Turning to the case at hand, the Court has previously approved
the same or higher billing rate as reasonable in the Augusta and
Savannah legal markets. See, e.g.. Plumbers and Steamfitters Local
No. 150 V. Muns Grp., Inc., CV 115-200, Doc. 37 (S.D. Ga. Mar. 22,
2017) (setting $300.00 per hour as reasonable billing rate in
Augusta); Savannah-Chatham Cnty. Fair Hous. Council v. Alvin L.
Davis, Inc., 2007 WL 1288130, at *5 (S.D. Ga. Apr. 30, 2007)
(finding $250.00 is reasonable hourly rate in Savannah area).
Further, the hours expended were not excessive and relate only to
defense counsel's time spent working on the motion for sanctions,
as required by Rule 11.
may
award
to
the
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c)(2) ("[T]he court
prevailing
party
the
reasonable
expenses,
including attorney's fees, incurred for the motion.")
Finally,
defense counsel's efforts achieved a positive result for Defendant
by winning the motion for sanctions and preventing Plaintiff from
continuing to harass Defendant with frivolous motions. See Norman,
836 F.2d at 1302 ("If the result was excellent, then the court
should compensate for all hours reasonably expended.")
Based on the foregoing, the Court finds the fees sought by
Ms. Cox and Mr. Lavoie to be reasonable in both time spent and
rate
charged.
Therefore,
attorneys'
fees
in
the
amount
of
$1,750.00 are AWARDED to Defendant for her expenses incurred as a
result of the Rule 11 motion for sanctions.
ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia, this "7^ day of March,
2019.
J. RAI7DAL HALL, CHIEF JUDGE
STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?