Pinnacle Agriculture Distribution, Inc. v. Kight
Filing
17
ORDERED, within 14 days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff must respond and SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed on abandonment grounds. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 4/2/19. (loh)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
STATESBORO DIVISION
PINNACLE AGRICULTURE
DISTRIBUTION, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
ALVIE KIGHT, JR.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CV617-113
)
)
)
ORDER
Plaintiff filed this action, seeking to recover $252,956.95 from the
defendant on an unpaid open account. See doc. 1 (Complaint). Defendant
answered, doc. 9, and the parties conducted at least some discovery. See
doc. 13 (Status Report).
The Court granted an extension of time to
complete discovery, and consequent extensions of other pending deadlines,
on April 24, 2018. See doc. 15. Those extended deadlines have long since
passed, without any further indication of progress from the parties. See
id. (requiring all motions, excluding motions in limine, be filed by
November 16, 2018).
Accordingly, within 14 days of the date of this Order, the plaintiff
must respond and SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed
on abandonment grounds. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); S.D. Ga. L.R. 41.1(c).;
Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962) (courts have the
inherent authority to dismiss claims for lack of prosecution); Mingo v.
Sugar Cane Growers Co-op, 864 F.2d 101, 102 (11th Cir. 1989); Jones v.
Graham, 709 F.2d 1457, 1458 (11th Cir. 1983); Floyd v. United States,
CV491-277 (S.D. Ga. June 10, 1992). Failure to respond to this Order will
result in a recommendation of dismissal of this action.
SO ORDERED, this 2nd day of April, 2019.
p ,
________________________
_________________________
_
_
_ _
_
Christopher
Christopher L. Ray
h
United States Magistrate Judge
Southern District of Georgia
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?