The Candler County Hospital Authority v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al

Filing 3

Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-8) MDL No. 2804.(jrb) Modified on 2/12/2018 (jrb).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION MDL No. 2804 (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO 8) On December 5, 2017, the Panel transferred 62 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See _F.Supp.3d_ (J.P.M.L. 2017). Since that time, 254 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of Ohio. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Dan A. Polster. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Ohio and assigned to Judge Polster. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of Ohio for the reasons stated in the order of December 5, 2017, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Dan A. Polster. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7 day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. FOR THE PANEL: Feb 12, 2018 Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel I hereby certify that this instrument is a true and correct copy of the original on file in my office. Attest: Sandy Opacich, Clerk U.S. District Court Northern District of Ohio By: /s/Robert Pitts Deputy Clerk IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION SCHEDULE CTO 8 DIST DIV. MDL No. 2804 TAG ALONG ACTIONS C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION 6 18 00143 Marion County, Alabama et al v. Purdue Pharma LP et al 1 18 00219 County of Huerfano v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al Candler County, Georgia v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al The Candler County Hospital Authority v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al ALABAMA NORTHERN ALN COLORADO CO GEORGIA SOUTHERN GAS 6 18 00011 GAS 6 18 00012 INDIANA SOUTHERN INS 1 18 00242 HOWARD COUNTY, INDIANA v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et al NEW YORK NORTHERN NYN 5 18 00100 County of Onondaga, New York v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN NCW 3 18 00045 Gaston County v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al Franklin County Board of County Commissioners v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al Lebanon City of v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al OHIO SOUTHERN OHS 2 18 00077 OHS 2 18 00078 TEXAS NORTHERN TXN 7 18 00017 County of Clay v. Purdue Pharma LP et al 18 00011 County Of Webb v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al TEXAS SOUTHERN TXS 5 WASHINGTON WESTERN WAW 2 18 00120 Skagit County et al v. Purdue Pharma, LP et al

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?