Dooley v. Heins et al

Filing 24

ORDER ADOPTING the 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as the Court's opinion, dismissing Plaintiff's monetary damages claims against Defendants in their official capacities. Plaintiff's deliberate indifference claims against Defendants in their individual capacities remain pending. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 02/14/2020. (jlh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION QUENTIN DOOLEY, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 6:18-cv-49 Plaintiff, V. DR. HEINS; and DR. BROOME, Defendants. ORDER After an independent and de novo review ofthe entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, doc. 23. Plaintiff did not file Objections to the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiffs monetary damages claims against Defendants in their official capacities. Plaintiffs deliberate indifference claims against Defendants in their individual capacities remain pending. SO ORDERED,this._i4^day of February, 2020. j. rakdaltiall,chief judge UNITgjySTATES DISTRICT COURT SUUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?