Hill v. Davis et al
Filing
16
ORDER Directing USMS Service of Process re 1 Complaint, 14 Affidavit, and 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS upon Defendants Sergeant Freddie Davis, Warden James Deal, Warden Brian Adams, Officer Brownlee, Officer Cain, CERT Williams, CERT Powe ll, CERT Jackson, CERT Michaels, CERT Cook, CERT Miller, Lieutenant Chambers, and Sergeant Sistrunk, by the United States Marshal without prepayment of cost.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 11/18/2020. (Attachments: # 1 USM 285 Forms) (MG)
Case 6:19-cv-00022-JRH-BWC Document 16 Filed 11/18/20 Page 1 of 6
FILED
Scott L. Poff, Clerk
United States District Court
By mgarcia at 2:04 pm, Nov 18, 2020
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
STATESBORO DIVISION
RICHARD J. HILL,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 6:19-cv-22
v.
SGT. FREDDIE DAVIS, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
Plaintiff, who is presently incarcerated at Georgia State Prison in Reidsville, Georgia,
filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging claims of excessive force, failure to intervene,
and failure to protect against a number of prison officials at Georgia State Prison. Docs. 1, 14,
14-1. This Court has conducted its frivolity screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and has
concluded the following portions of Plaintiff’s Complaint survive frivolity review: Plaintiff’s
Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Davis, Brownlee, Cain, Jackson, Powell,
Williams, Miller, Michaels, Cook, Chambers, and Sistrunk and certain of Plaintiff’s claims for
injunctive relief against Defendants Deal and Adams. 1
Therefore, a copy of Plaintiff’s Complaint and Supplemental Complaint, docs. 1, 14, 141, a copy of this Order, and a copy of the undersigned’s Report recommending dismissal of some
of Plaintiff’s claims (which is being issued contemporaneously with this Order) shall be served
upon Defendants Sergeant Freddie Davis, Warden James Deal, Warden Brian Adams, Officer
1
The undersigned, in his Report issued contemporaneously with this Order, recommended denying
Plaintiff’s claims for injunctive relief that requested pressing charges against Defendant Davis and
demoting Defendant Sistrunk. Plaintiff’s other requests for injunctive relief have survived the Court’s
frivolity screening.
Case 6:19-cv-00022-JRH-BWC Document 16 Filed 11/18/20 Page 2 of 6
Brownlee, Officer Cain, CERT Williams, CERT Powell, CERT Jackson, CERT Michaels, CERT
Cook, CERT Miller, Lieutenant Chambers, and Sergeant Sistrunk by the United States Marshal
without prepayment of cost. The Court also DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to serve a copy of this
Order and a copy of the undersigned’s Report recommending dismissal of some of Plaintiff’s
claims (which is being issued contemporaneously with this Order) upon Plaintiff.
The Court also provides the following instructions to the parties that will apply to the
remainder of this action.
INSTRUCTIONS TO ALL DEFENDANTS IN THIS ACTION
Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the undersigned directs that service be
effected by the United States Marshal. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). In most cases, the marshal will
first mail a copy of the complaint to a defendant by first-class mail and request that the defendant
waive formal service of summons. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d); Local R. 4.5. A defendant has a duty to
avoid unnecessary costs of serving the summons, and any defendant who fails to comply with the
request for waiver must bear the costs of personal service unless good cause can be shown for
the failure to return the waiver. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). Generally, a defendant who timely returns
the waiver is not required to answer the complaint until 60 days after the date that the marshal
sent the request for waiver. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(3).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any Defendant in this action is granted leave of court
to take the deposition of Plaintiff upon oral examination. Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(a)(2). Defendants
are further advised the Court’s standard 140-day discovery period will commence upon the filing
of the last answer. Local R. 26.1. Defendants shall ensure all discovery, including Plaintiff’s
deposition and any other depositions in the case, is completed within that discovery period.
2
Case 6:19-cv-00022-JRH-BWC Document 16 Filed 11/18/20 Page 3 of 6
If a Defendant takes the deposition of any other person, Defendants are ordered to
comply with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30. As Plaintiff will not likely
attend such a deposition, the Defendant taking the deposition must notify Plaintiff of the
deposition and advise him that he may serve on that Defendant written questions Plaintiff wishes
to propound to the witness, if any. Defendants shall present such questions to the witness in
order and word-for-word during the deposition. Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(c). Plaintiff must submit the
questions in a sealed envelope within 10 days of the notice of deposition.
INSTRUCTIONS TO PLAINTIFF
Plaintiff is charged with the responsibility of immediately informing this Court and
defense counsel of any change of address during the pendency of this action. Local R. 11.1.
Plaintiff’s failure to notify the Court of a change in his address may result in dismissal of this
case.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of every pleading or other
document submitted for consideration by the Court on each Defendant (or, if appearance has
been entered by counsel, the Defendant’s attorney). Plaintiff shall include with the original
paper to be filed with the Clerk of Court a certificate stating the date on which a true and correct
copy of any document was mailed to each Defendant or the Defendant’s counsel. Fed. R. Civ. P.
5. “Every pleading shall contain a caption setting forth the name of the court, the title of the
action, [and] the file number.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a).
Plaintiff has the responsibility for pursuing this case. For example, if Plaintiff wishes to
obtain facts and information about the case from a Defendant, Plaintiff must initiate discovery.
See generally Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37. The discovery period in this case will
expire 140 days after the filing of the last answer. Local R. 26.1. Plaintiff does not need the
3
Case 6:19-cv-00022-JRH-BWC Document 16 Filed 11/18/20 Page 4 of 6
permission of the Court to begin discovery, and Plaintiff should begin discovery promptly and
complete it within this time period. Id. Discovery materials should not be filed routinely with
the Clerk of Court; exceptions include: when the Court directs filing; when a party needs such
materials in connection with a motion or response, and then only to the extent necessary; and
when needed for use at trial. Local R. 26.4.
Interrogatories are a practical method of discovery for incarcerated persons. See Fed. R.
Civ. P. 33. Interrogatories may be served only on a party to the litigation, and, for the purposes
of the instant case, this means that interrogatories should not be directed to persons or
organizations who are not named as a defendant. Interrogatories are not to contain more than 25
questions. Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(a). If Plaintiff wishes to propound more than 25 interrogatories to
a party, Plaintiff must have permission of the Court. If Plaintiff wishes to file a motion to
compel, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37, he should first contact the attorney for
Defendants and try to work out the problem; if Plaintiff proceeds with the motion to compel, he
should also file a statement certifying that he has contacted opposing counsel in a good faith
effort to resolve any dispute about discovery. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c), 37(a)(2)(A); Local R. 26.5.
Plaintiff has the responsibility for maintaining his own records of the case. If Plaintiff
loses papers and needs new copies, he may obtain them from the Clerk of Court at the standard
cost of fifty cents ($.50) per page. If Plaintiff seeks copies, he should request them directly
from the Clerk of Court and is advised that the Court will authorize and require the
collection of fees from his prison trust fund account to pay the cost of the copies at the
aforementioned rate of fifty cents ($.50) per page.
If Plaintiff does not press his case forward, the court may dismiss it for failure to
prosecute. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41; Local R. 41.1.
4
Case 6:19-cv-00022-JRH-BWC Document 16 Filed 11/18/20 Page 5 of 6
It is Plaintiff’s duty to cooperate in any discovery initiated by a Defendant. Upon no less
than five days’ notice of the scheduled deposition date, Plaintiff must appear and permit his
deposition to be taken and must answer, under oath or solemn affirmation, any question which
seeks information relevant to the subject matter of the pending action.
As the case progresses, Plaintiff may receive a notice addressed to “counsel of record”
directing the parties to prepare and submit a Joint Status Report and a Proposed Pretrial Order.
A plaintiff proceeding without counsel may prepare and file a unilateral Status Report and is
required to prepare and file his own version of the Proposed Pretrial Order. A plaintiff who is
incarcerated shall not be required or entitled to attend any status or pretrial conference which
may be scheduled by the Court.
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS TO PLAINTIFF REGARDING
MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
A Defendant may choose to ask the Court to dismiss this action by filing a motion to
dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or both. Under this Court’s Local Rules, a party
opposing a motion to dismiss shall file and serve his response to the motion within 14 days of its
service. Failure to respond shall indicate that there is no opposition to a motion. Local R. 7.5.
Therefore, if Plaintiff fails to respond to a motion to dismiss, the Court will assume that he does
not oppose the Defendant’s motion. Plaintiff’s case may be dismissed for lack of prosecution if
Plaintiff fails to respond to a motion to dismiss.
Plaintiff’s response to a motion for summary judgment must be filed within 21 days after
service of the motion. Local R. 7.5, 56.1. The failure to respond to such a motion shall indicate
that there is no opposition to the motion. Furthermore, each material fact set forth in a
Defendant’s statement of material facts will be deemed admitted unless specifically controverted
by an opposition statement. If a Defendant files a motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff will
5
Case 6:19-cv-00022-JRH-BWC Document 16 Filed 11/18/20 Page 6 of 6
have the burden of establishing the existence of a genuine dispute as to any material fact in this
case. That burden cannot be met by reliance on the conclusory allegations contained within the
complaint. If a Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is supported by affidavit, Plaintiff
must file counter-affidavits if he wants to contest Defendant’s statement of the facts. If Plaintiff
fails to file opposing affidavits setting forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine dispute
for trial, any factual assertions made in the Defendant’s affidavits will be accepted as true and
summary judgment may be entered against Plaintiff pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
56.
SO ORDERED, this 18th day of November, 2020.
____________________________________
BENJAMIN W. CHEESBRO
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?