Cobble v. Commissioner of Georgia Dept of Corr. et al
Filing
19
ORDER Adopting the Magistrate Judge's 13 Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's objections are Overruled, and the Petition is Dismissed. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 5/10/2022. (csr)
Case 6:20-cv-00106-JRH-CLR Document 19 Filed 05/10/22 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
STATESBORO DIVISION
DANIEL COBBLE,
Petitioner,
CV620-106
COMMISSIONER OF GEORGIA DEPT OF
CORR., U.S. BOP, U.S. AG,U.S.
MARSHALS, U.S. GOVERNMENT,and
WARDEN TREVONZO BOBBITT,
Respondents.
ORDER
After a careful ^ novo review of the record in this case, the Court concurs with the
Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (R&R) of August 2, 2021, doc. 13, to which
objections have been filed, doc. 15. Accordingly, the R&R is ADOPTED, the objections are
OVERRULED,and the petition is DISMISSED. Doc. 1.
To ensure compliance with 28 U.S.C. § 2244, which allows second or successive federal
habeas petitions only with prior approval from the Eleventh Circuit, the Magistrate Judge
recommended that the Court require petitioner to provide information about his litigation history
with any future habeas petition he files. Doc. 13 at 5-7. Petitioner is DIRECTED that, when
filing any habeas petition in this District Court, he must submit a complete list of all of his prior
cases before this or any other court, including for each case every involved party, the considering
court, the docket number, and every asserted claim. The list must include the following language:
Case 6:20-cv-00106-JRH-CLR Document 19 Filed 05/10/22 Page 2 of 2
"I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date)." See 28 U.S.C. § 1746.
ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia, this /(^dav of May,2022.
/
/
J. Rj^tNDKL HALI^^ CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOyTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?