Cobble v. Commissioner of Georgia Dept of Corr. et al

Filing 19

ORDER Adopting the Magistrate Judge's 13 Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's objections are Overruled, and the Petition is Dismissed. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 5/10/2022. (csr)

Download PDF
Case 6:20-cv-00106-JRH-CLR Document 19 Filed 05/10/22 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION DANIEL COBBLE, Petitioner, CV620-106 COMMISSIONER OF GEORGIA DEPT OF CORR., U.S. BOP, U.S. AG,U.S. MARSHALS, U.S. GOVERNMENT,and WARDEN TREVONZO BOBBITT, Respondents. ORDER After a careful ^ novo review of the record in this case, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (R&R) of August 2, 2021, doc. 13, to which objections have been filed, doc. 15. Accordingly, the R&R is ADOPTED, the objections are OVERRULED,and the petition is DISMISSED. Doc. 1. To ensure compliance with 28 U.S.C. § 2244, which allows second or successive federal habeas petitions only with prior approval from the Eleventh Circuit, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court require petitioner to provide information about his litigation history with any future habeas petition he files. Doc. 13 at 5-7. Petitioner is DIRECTED that, when filing any habeas petition in this District Court, he must submit a complete list of all of his prior cases before this or any other court, including for each case every involved party, the considering court, the docket number, and every asserted claim. The list must include the following language: Case 6:20-cv-00106-JRH-CLR Document 19 Filed 05/10/22 Page 2 of 2 "I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date)." See 28 U.S.C. § 1746. ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia, this /(^dav of May,2022. / / J. Rj^tNDKL HALI^^ CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOyTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?