Coast v. Adams et al
Filing
46
ORDER ADOPTING the 43 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as the Court's opinion, granting Defendant's 39 Motion for Summary Judgment, directing the Clerk to enter a final judgment in favor of Defendant, and closing this civil action. Signed by District Judge J. Randal Hall on 08/29/2024. (jlh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
STATESBORO DIVISION
JEROME COAST,JR.,
Plaintiff,
CV 623-029
V.
MICHAEL HARTMEYER,Unit Manager,
Defendant.
ORDER
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate
Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed.' Accordingly,
the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion,
GRANTS Defendant's motion for summai'y judgment,(doc. no. 39), DIRECTS the Clerk to
ENTER a final judgment in favor of Defendant, and CLOSES this civil action.
SO ORDERED this
day of August, 2024, at Augusta, Georgia.
HONORAmE^. RANDAL HALL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
' The same day the Report and Recommendation was entered, the Court received a second response from
Plaintiff to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. no. 45; see also doc. no. 42.) Plaintiff filed the second
response, which presents the same arguments as his first response,(doc. no.42), because he believed his first response
had not been received by the Court,(doc. no. 45, p. 1). Accordingly, the second response raises no new arguments,
and nothing in Plaintiffs second response changes the Magistrate Judge's analysis Defendant's motion for summary
judgment should be granted.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?