Coast v. Adams et al

Filing 46

ORDER ADOPTING the 43 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as the Court's opinion, granting Defendant's 39 Motion for Summary Judgment, directing the Clerk to enter a final judgment in favor of Defendant, and closing this civil action. Signed by District Judge J. Randal Hall on 08/29/2024. (jlh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION JEROME COAST,JR., Plaintiff, CV 623-029 V. MICHAEL HARTMEYER,Unit Manager, Defendant. ORDER After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed.' Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, GRANTS Defendant's motion for summai'y judgment,(doc. no. 39), DIRECTS the Clerk to ENTER a final judgment in favor of Defendant, and CLOSES this civil action. SO ORDERED this day of August, 2024, at Augusta, Georgia. HONORAmE^. RANDAL HALL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ' The same day the Report and Recommendation was entered, the Court received a second response from Plaintiff to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. no. 45; see also doc. no. 42.) Plaintiff filed the second response, which presents the same arguments as his first response,(doc. no.42), because he believed his first response had not been received by the Court,(doc. no. 45, p. 1). Accordingly, the second response raises no new arguments, and nothing in Plaintiffs second response changes the Magistrate Judge's analysis Defendant's motion for summary judgment should be granted.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?