Holley v. Core Civic et al
Filing
7
ORDER re 3 Order & 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Clerk is DIRECTED to resend the service copy of the Order and Report and Recommendation to Holley's updated address. The Court will, sua sponte, extend his deadline to submit objections to the Report and Recommendation until fourteen days from the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 1/3/24. (loh)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
STATESBORO DIVISION
SIR HOLLEY,
Plaintiff,
v.
CORE CIVIC, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CV624-075
ORDER
On December 17, 2024, the Court recommended that pro se plaintiff
Sir Holley’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Complaint be dismissed because of his
failure to disclose his prior litigation.
See generally doc. 4.
His
deadline to file objections to that recommendation remains pending.
See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2), see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(1)(c), (d).
On
December 23, the Clerk received a notice that Holley’s address had
changed.
See doc. 5. On December 31, 2024, the United States Postal
Service returned the service copy of the Court’s Order and Report and
Recommendation, which was sent to Holley’s prior address, as
undeliverable.
See doc. 6.
It appears, therefore, that Holley has not
had any notice of the Court’s recommendation. The Clerk is, therefore,
1
DIRECTED to resend the service copy of the Order and Report and
Recommendation, docs. 3 & 4, to Holley’s updated address. The Court
will, sua sponte, extend his deadline to submit objections to the Report
and Recommendation until fourteen days from the date of this Order.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A).
SO ORDERED, this 3rd day of January,
y, 2024.
_______________________________
____________________________
HRISTOPHER
STO
T PH
HER
E L. RAY
CHRIS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?