Starn O'Toole Marcus & Fisher v. United States of America, The

Filing 41

ORDER ADOPTING May 10, 2007 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION RE Petition to Quash Internal Revenue Summonses Filed October 23, 2006 for 13 . Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 4/8/09. (gls, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII STARN O'TOOLE MARCUS & FISHER and PETER STARN, ) ) ) Petitioners, ) ) vs. ) ) THE UNITED STATES OF ) AMERICA, ) Respondent. ) ) _______________________________ ) CIVIL NO. 06-00572 JMS/LEK ORDER ADOPTING MAY 10, 2007 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RE PETITION TO QUASH INTERNAL REVENUE SUMMONSES FILED OCTOBER 23, 2006 ORDER ADOPTING MAY 10, 2007 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RE PETITION TO QUASH INTERNAL REVENUE SUMMONSES FILED OCTOBER 23, 2006 On May 10, 2007, Magistrate Judge Kobayashi entered her "Findings and Recommendations Re Petition to Quash Internal Revenue Summonses Filed October 23, 2006" (the "May 10, 2007 F&R"), which, among other things, recommended that the court deny the Petition to Quash.1 The court hereby /// /// /// The May 10, 2007 F&R also required Petitioners to produce non-privileged documents and requiring the parties to meet and confer. The court views these requirements not as recommendations but as orders because they address non-dispositive issues and the parties took action on them. 1 ADOPTS the May 10, 2007 F&R and DENIES the Petition to Quash. Because no issues remain in this case, the court ORDERS the Clerk of Court to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, April 8, 2009. /s/ J. Michael Seabright J. Michael Seabright United States District Judge Starn O'Toole Marcus & Fisher et al. v. United States, Civ. No. 06-00572 JMS/LEK, Order Adopting May 10, 2007 Findings and Recommendations re Petition to Quash Internal Revenue Summonses Filed October 23, 2006 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?