Sylvester et al v. Menu Foods, Inc. et al

Filing 16

Sylvester et al v. Menu Foods, Inc. et al

UNITE PAIIEL Case 1:07-cv-00409-ACK-KSCD STATESJUDICIAL Filed 08/24/2007 Document 16-4 on M U L T I D I S T R I C T LITIGATION
MEMBERS:
J u d g e D. Lowell Jensen U n i t e d States District Court N o r t h e r n District of California J u d g e J. Frederick Motz U n i t e d States District Court D i s t r i c t of Maryland J u d g e Robert L. Miller, Jr. U n i t e d States District Court N o r t h e r n District of Indiana J u d g e Kathryn H. Vratil U n i t e d States District Court D i s t r i c t of Kansas J u d g e David R. Hansen U n i t e d States Court of Appeals E i g h t h Circuit J u d g e Anthony J. Scirica U n i t e d States Court of Appeals Third Circuit

Doc. 16 Att. 3

Page 1 of 1

J u d g eJohnG. HeyburnlI U n i t e dStates DistrictCourt Western Districtof Kentucky

CHAIRMAN:

DIRECT REPLTTOIJ e f f e r y N. Liithi C l e r k of the Panel O n e Columbus Circle. NE T h u r g o o d Marshall Federal Judiciary Building R o o m G-255. North Lobbv W a s h i n g t o n , ' D . C . 20002' T e l e p h o n e : [202] 502-2800 Fax: [202] 502-2888 h t t p : / / w w w jpml.uscourts.gov

A u g u s t20,2007 T O INVOLVEDCOLINSEL R e : MDL-I850-- IN RE PetFoodProducrs LiabilityLitigation
( S e eAttachedCTO-4) D e a r Counsel: A t t a c h e dheretois a copy of a conditionaltransferorder filed todayby the Panelinvolving the abovecaptioned matter. This matteris transferred pursuant Rule 7 .4 of theRulesofProcedureof theJudicialPanel to o n Multidistrict Liti-eation, 99 F.R.D. 425, 435-36 1 (200i ). Copiesof Rule 5.2,dealingwith service, Rules and 7.4 and7.5, regardtng "tag-along"actions,are attached your convenience. for I n a s m u c has thereis an unavoidabletime lag betweennotification of the pendencyof the tag-along a c t i o nandthe filing of a conditionaltransferorder,counselarerequiredby Rule 7.4(b)to notify this office BY F A C S I M I L E , at [phone], any official changes the statusof the tag-alongaction. Thesechanges of in c o u l d involve dismissalof the action,remandto statecourt,transferto anotherfederalcourt, etc.,asindicated b y an orderfiled by the district court. Your cooperation would be appreciated. N O T I C E OF OPPOSITION DUE ON OR BEFORE: September4" 2007 (4 p.m. EST) ( F a c s i m i l etransmission suggested.) is I f you are considering opposingthis conditionaltransferorder,pleasereview Rules 7.4 and7.5 of the P a n e lRulesbefore filing your Notice of Opposition. A list of involved counselis attached.

Very truly, JefferyN. Liithi C l e r kof thePanel

Attachments

J P M LForm39
Dockets.Justia.com