Coastal Construction Company, Inc. v. North American Specialty Insurance Company et al

Filing 43

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 39 . Signed by JUDGE DAVID ALAN EZRA on 8/3/2010. (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications will be served by first class mail on August 5, 2010.

Coastal Construction Company, Inc. v. North American Specialty Insurance Company et al

Doc. 43

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII COASTAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, vs. NORTH AMERICAN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY; HASEKO HOMES, INC.; HASEKO CONSTRUCTION, INC.; JOHN DOES 1-10; JANE DOES 1-10; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-10; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10; ROE "NON-PROFIT" CORPORATIONS 1-10; and ROE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES 110, Defendants. _____________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL 10-00206-DAE-BMK

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on July 14, 2010, and no objections having been filed by any party, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the "FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION THAT PLAINTIFF COASTAL CONSTRUCTION

Dockets.Justia.com

COMPANY, INC.'S MOTION FOR REMAND AND DEFENDANTS HASEKO HOMES, INC. AND HASEKO CONSTRUCTION, INC.'S MOTION FOR REMAND BE GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART," document no. 39, are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, August 3, 2010.

_____________________________ David Alan Ezra United States District Judge

Coastal Construction Company, Inc. vs. North American Special Insurance Company, et al., Civil No. 10-00206 DAE-BMK; ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION