Booth v. McManaman
Filing
40
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION. re: 35 Findings and Recommendation to Grant Lehua Booth's Motion (1) to Intervene; (2) for Appointment as Class Representative; and (3) for Leave to File Amended Co mplaint" ~ Signed by JUDGE DAVID ALAN EZRA on 10/28/2011. (afc) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
DAVID L. BOHN, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly
situated,
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
PATRICIA McMANAMAN, in her )
official capacity as Director of the
)
Department of Human Services, State )
of Hawaii,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_____________________________ )
CIVIL NO. 10-00680-DAE-RLP
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties
on October 11, 2011, and no objections having been filed by any party,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28,
United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the “FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT LEHUA BOOTH’S MOTION (1) TO
INTERVENE; (2) FOR APPOINTMENT AS CLASS REPRESENTATIVE;
AND (3) FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT,” docket entry no. 35,
are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, October 28, 2011.
_____________________________
David Alan Ezra
United States District Judge
David L. Bohn, et al. vs. Patricia McManaman, Civil No. 10-00680 DAE-RLP;
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?