Booth v. McManaman

Filing 40

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION. re: 35 Findings and Recommendation to Grant Lehua Booth's Motion (1) to Intervene; (2) for Appointment as Class Representative; and (3) for Leave to File Amended Co mplaint" ~ Signed by JUDGE DAVID ALAN EZRA on 10/28/2011. (afc) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII DAVID L. BOHN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) PATRICIA McMANAMAN, in her ) official capacity as Director of the ) Department of Human Services, State ) of Hawaii, ) ) Defendant. ) _____________________________ ) CIVIL NO. 10-00680-DAE-RLP ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on October 11, 2011, and no objections having been filed by any party, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the “FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT LEHUA BOOTH’S MOTION (1) TO INTERVENE; (2) FOR APPOINTMENT AS CLASS REPRESENTATIVE; AND (3) FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT,” docket entry no. 35, are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, October 28, 2011. _____________________________ David Alan Ezra United States District Judge David L. Bohn, et al. vs. Patricia McManaman, Civil No. 10-00680 DAE-RLP; ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?