Norris et al v. Countrywide Financial Corporation et al

Filing 73

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 72 Findings and Recommendation to Deny Defendant Greg Brown's Renewed Motion for Recovery of Attorneys' Fees and Costs. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 3/20/2012. (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). All participants are registered to receive electronic notifications.

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII DONALD NORRIS; DARCY NORRIS, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. ) SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST, ) COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL ) CORPORATION; THE BANK OF ) NEW YORK MELLON AS ) TRUSTEE FOR THE ) ALTERNATIVE LOAN ) TRUST 2007-HY3 MORTGAGE ) PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES ) SERIES 2007-HY3; BAC HOME ) LOANS SERVICING LP; RYAN ) MCNALLY; GREG BROWN; ) JOHN AND MARY DOES 1-6, ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________ ) CIVIL 11-00156-LEK-KSC ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on February 16, 2012, and no objections having been filed by any party, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the “FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY DEFENDANT GREG BROWN’S RENEWED MOTION FOR RECOVERY OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS,” docket entry no. 72, are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED AT HONOLULU, HAWAII, March 20, 2012. /S/ Leslie E. Kobayashi Leslie E. Kobayashi United States District Judge DONALD NORRIS, ET AL. V. BANK OF AMERICA, ET AL; CIVIL NO. 11-00156 LEK; ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?